Connect with us

Parliament

NCMP Hazel Poa queries: For whom are the Singapore Reserves saved as birth rates halve?

Hazel Poa, NCMP from the PSP, raised critical questions regarding Singapore’s reserve policies. In calling for a review, she queried the purpose of these reserves, particularly amidst declining birth rates and population growth largely reliant on new citizens’ influx.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hazel Poa, Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) from the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), raised critical questions regarding Singapore’s reserve policies during the motion filed by Mr Leong Mun Wai on Wednesday (7 Feb).

Mr Leong, NCMP and Secretary General of PSP also had called for the government to reassess its budget and reserve accumulation policies.

Her inquiries centered on the purpose of these reserves, particularly amidst declining birth rates and population growth largely reliant on new citizens’ influx.

The motion, focusing on Singapore’s public finances, urged the government to reevaluate budget and reserve accumulation strategies to alleviate present financial burdens while securing future generations’ welfare.

Ms Poa stated in her speech, “We keep hearing that the reserves are for the benefit of our children and grandchildren. But our total fertility rate has fallen to 1.05, which is half the replacement rate of 2.1.

“This means that the number of our children is halving with each generation.  So who exactly are we leaving our ever-growing reserves to?

“If not for over 20,000 new citizenships granted each year, our citizen population will start shrinking significantly in the coming years,” she said.

She noted that Singapore’s reserves are built up through collecting more from taxpayers than the Government spends on Singaporeans.

Hence, as the population ages, and the generations that have built up the reserves enter age groups where higher healthcare expenditures are incurred, “it is timely to review our reserve accumulation policies,” said Ms Poa.

“Should we be funding the higher healthcare expenditures through raising additional taxes like GST, or should we choose to slow down the building up of reserves and use land sales proceeds instead?”

To answer such questions, Ms Poa stated that accurate information on the financial status of the Government is needed.

Highlighting a significant disparity between household savings and governmental reserves, Ms Poa emphasized the urgency of prioritizing present needs over continued accumulation.

Despite acknowledging challenges in determining an ideal reserve level, she stressed the need for a balanced approach.

PSP estimates S$1.2 trillion of the Reserves

During the motion, she elaborated on the methodology employed by PSP to derive the estimate of S$1.2 trillion for Singapore’s financial reserves, outlining two distinct approaches.

Firstly, the calculation involved aggregating the assets overseen by GIC, Temasek, and MAS. This method was utilized by CNA in the documentary “Singapore Reserves: The Untold Story” in August 2023.

According to her, Temasek’s Net Portfolio Value latest available figure stands at S$382 billion, while the Official Foreign Reserves (OFR) managed by MAS amount to S$461 billion.

Notably, this sum excludes the S$247 billion of Reserves Management Government Securities (RMGS) issued when MAS transferred excess OFR to the Government.

Although the precise value of GIC-managed assets remains undisclosed, the combined total of assets under Temasek, OFR, and RMGS yields a conservative estimate of S$1.09 trillion for the financial reserves.

The second approach, as she asserted, involved scrutinizing the latest Government Financial Statements.

These statements indicate total financial assets of S$1.73 trillion as of end-March 2023, juxtaposed with government borrowings totaling S$1.08 trillion. Deducting government borrowings from total assets yields a net financial assets figure of $0.65 trillion.

Notably, Government Financial Statements do not encompass the assets of statutory boards like MAS. Therefore, by aggregating the net assets under GFS and incorporating OFR and RMGS under MAS, the estimation reaches $1.36 trillion.

Consequently, Ms Poa posited that the actual size of the Financial Reserves lies somewhere within the range of $1.09 trillion to $1.36 trillion.

Asserting the reasonableness of the S$1.2 trillion estimate, she urged the Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister during the motion to provide clarification if they contested this figure.

How CPF contributes into the Reserves

Ms Poa further discussed how the increased returns generated on Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings, coupled with the lower interest rates paid to CPF members, additionally bolster the accumulation of reserves.

She started by saying, “as of the end of 2022, Singaporeans have accumulated S$545 billion in CPF savings. These savings are used to buy government securities and is then passed on to be managed by GIC and MAS.”

GIC has revealed that its nominal rate of return averaged 6.9% over the past 20 years in US dollar terms.

“If we take into account the depreciation of US dollars relative to Singdollars over the same period, we can estimate that the rate of return is about 5.4% in Singdollar terms,” stated Ms Poa.

The Minister for Manpower announced last year that CPF members earn an average interest rate close to 4%.

The disparity of 1.4 percentage points between the rate of return earned by GIC and the interest rate paid to CPF members directly contributes to the reserves and could currently amount to approximately S$7 billion annually.

“Will the Government reveal the average discrepancy between the rate of return earned from investing CPF savings and the interest rate paid to CPF members over the last 20 years? How much have Singaporeans contributed to the reserves through our CPF savings? Could these returns not have been distributed to CPF members?” she queried.

She urged the government to disclose the disparity between returns earned from CPF investments and interest rates paid to members.

Meanwhile, her colleague, Leong Mun Wai, also a NCMP from PSP had scrutinized the government’s policy of charging land costs for public housing.

This practice, he argued during the debate motion, burdens taxpayers and contributes to high deficits for the Housing Development Board (HDB).

Challenges of over-accumulating Reserves: Impacts on retirement and cost of living

Additionally, the debate shed light on the costs of over-accumulating reserves, with Ms Poa emphasizing the adverse impact on retirement adequacy and living expenses, particularly concerning recent GST hikes and high HDB prices.

“If we do not put the excess returns from CPF savings into the reserves, it can be paid to CPF members to improve their retirement adequacy,” Ms Poa said.

“A 1.4% difference in return may not seem like much but it makes a big difference over a long time. For example, a savings of S$50,000 earning an interest of 4% would grow to S$162,000 after 30 years. If the interest rate were 5.4%, it would grow to S$242,000.”

Thus, the accumulation of reserves leads to lower retirement adequacy.

Additionally, reserve accumulation stems from charging land costs for public housing, as elucidated by Mr Leong Mun Wai. This constitutes a significant expenditure for HDB, necessitating funding from government revenue.

“If land cost was not an expenditure item, the need for government to raise revenue by raising taxes like GST would be reduced.

“The recent GST hikes came at a very bad time and directly added to the cost of living pressures faced by many Singaporeans,” Ms Poa explained.

Moreover, Ms Poa emphasized that even with subsidies and grants, the elevated prices of HDB flats pose a challenge for many young couples. This predicament, in turn, could adversely affect their considerations regarding family planning.

PSP also contends that funneling all land sales proceeds into the reserves is excessive.

“Since land is no longer sold freehold, it is effectively a renewable source of income for Singapore.

“Land sales revenue should be recognised as revenue divided over the lease tenure. This will further reduce the need to raise taxes and  impose further financial burden on taxpayers,” Ms Poa said.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
15 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

The 70% do not care about accountability, nor do they want to know the current state of the reserves.

All we do know is that the desire of the ruling government to grow the reserves has led to the sky high cost of private and public housing and the cost of living through increases in rentals too. Who exactly does this benefit? The rent-seekers of course. Many of which can be traced back to Tema$ek Holding$, GIC.

Ms Poa might as well ask the same kind of questions, along the same line….as in…
What are Sinkie males doing NS for?
Who are they defending for?😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣

Is Ms Poa trying to tell the daft locals the Reserve are but a piggy bank for those Elites and for them to do what they want with the money?
Nah, even if it was true and still true, those daft locals would not believe lah!😆😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣

C’mon, isn’t it bloody obvious !!! !!!

The SillyPoreReserves are saved and earmarked for the pap, their family, their family’s families, their family’s family’s families and of course, their cronies too !!!

Why bother with questions, that you oredi know the answers to !!!

做牛做马 还不要紧。still use as off-shore acct to collect back all the resources …

That why I say the State 2 dun need to save so much … Earn how much use how much lest ppl plot your death and take back all your hard earn money …

They dun want to stop working becos it is a death sentence in their Cult. No?!?

It probably is Bottomless that why can’t declare

You fucking oppies don’t say no need to save for the future. When come to crunch time don’t open mouth big big for money and why government don’t help the people. Silly dumb oppies indeed.

Singapore national reserves are reserved only for kaki lang for generation after generation. Singapore birth rate falling but this SGov has no concrete plan to arrest the problem. Singapore mental illness is rising and this SGov has plans to increase number of bed and professionals, but still does not arrest the causes. Why more and younger citizens suffer mental illness? Is it due to smaller houses and houses built very closely to one another? Is it the imported foods we have? Is it the building of this little country has gone wrong in the first place? Is it due to… Read more »

Members of PSP, you might be right in your estimation of our reserve, but the question is, “Is there anything in our reserve?” . With so many losses by our Temasek in the past, are we sure there is anything left? Furthermore, we have built a lot of white elephants which costs a lot to maintain!

Feeding and housing so many new citizen also costs a lot. Including treat their waste!

Similarly, reserve land for future YET TO BE BORN – Is Desmond telling lies when,
1. this PAP HAS NO EFFECTIVE policy to RAISE Sheeps birth rates for as many as 10s of years. So WHO IS YET TO BE BORN – the 80+ PAP MPs each Fkking HARD, sex in small spaces to born 100 children EACH?
2. Even when birth rates INCREASE MIRACULOUSLY, this takes ANOTHER day 20, 30 years FOR them to apply ‘rental flats’. Is Desmond lying to us this Administration MAKING PLANS now for 20,30 years DOWN the road?

Trending

Discover more from Gutzy Asia

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading