Connect with us

Parliament

Eric Chua: Scope of MIS Report 2023 goes beyond basic needs covered by government aid schemes

On Wednesday, Members of Parliament of the Singapore Parliament engaged in a vigorous debate on essential requirements in light of the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) 2023 report that states a couple with two children requires S$6,693 per month and S$1,492 for a single elderly individual.

Eric Chua, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development, emphasized that the figures stated in the MIS Report 2023 extends beyond the scope of basic needs addressed by government aid schemes.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Eric Chua, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development, pointed out that the Minimum Income Standards (MIS) Report 2023 goes beyond addressing the fundamental needs covered by government aid schemes.

“Because they are going beyond what is basic needs, they’re imagining something that’s aspirational, something that is perhaps more than basic.”

“What we cater for in ComCare, in our subsidies and in our financial assistance schemes, caters for basic needs and we do need to look at the entirety of what is given or what is provided to the families.”

On Wednesday (4 Oct), Singaporean Members of Parliament engaged in a robust discussion regarding the definition of essential requirements. This deliberation was prompted by a recent study on minimum income sufficiency.

In response to the MIS Report 2023, conducted by NTU and LKYSPP, the Government in a joint statement on 14 September emphasized that the study suggesting minimum household income requirements amid inflation “might not accurately reflect basic needs”. Instead, the findings should be seen as “what individuals would like to have.”

The government’s statement added that it goes beyond addressing fundamental necessities such as housing, food, and clothing.

MP urges Singapore government to conduct comprehensive living wage study

Mr Ang Wei Neng, the PAP MP representing West Coast GRC, inquired whether, based on the insights from the Minimum Income Standard Report 2023, the Ministry for Social and Family Development would consider adjusting the financial assistance rendered to low-income families.

He also asked if the government would conduct its own study to determine the level of living wage required to support a basic standard of living using various Government data beyond what is publicly available.

In response, Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Social and Family Development, Eric Chua, stated that the MSF regularly evaluates the coverage and payout amounts of ComCare schemes.

This ensures sufficient support for lower-income families in meeting their essential living needs, with the latest increase in assistance quantum implemented for ComCare Short-to-Medium Term Assistance and Long-Term Assistance in August 2022.

“During these reviews, MSF references data and information from different sources. ”

“These include price data from the Department of Statistics, views from domain experts and community stakeholders, as well as academic studies and research commissioned by MSF, “he added.

Mr Ang then pointed out that the MIS report specifies a minimum income standard budget of S$6,693 per month for a household with two children, which translates to about S$1,600 per capita. This income level is stated to be equivalent to the 30th percentile of all working households in Singapore.

He questioned whether the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) believes that setting the criteria at S$800 per capita income for financial assistance systems is either too high or too low.

Mr Ang highlighted the “big discrepancy” between the MIS report’s recommendation, proposing a monthly income of approximately $1,680 per capita to meet basic needs, and the Government’s response, which set the national average monthly expenditure at $1,650 per capita.

“If MSF disagrees with this report, which is internationally conducted in many countries, why would not MSF consider doing its own report, using the data available to MSF to refute this or to convince the Singaporeans better?” Mr Ang asked.

In response, Mr Chua raised concerns about the report’s methodology.

He pointed out that many of the 300 participants in the small group discussions were not from low-income households, making it difficult for minority voices to be heard due to group dynamics.

Mr Chua also highlighted the incorrect assumption in the study that low-income households receive the same amount of financial help as median-income households.

He added that the study assumes that low-income households get the same amount of financial help as median-income households, which is incorrect.

Mr Chua emphasized that the MIS study delves beyond the basic needs covered by government aid schemes.

It examines “what it takes to enable a sense of belonging, respect, security, independence”, which represents aspirational goals individuals or families might desire.

Associate Professor Jamus Lim, Workers’ Party MP for Sengkang GRC, made the case that items like perfume could be considered as basic needs, especially in Singapore’s hot climate.

“Perfume may seem like a bit of an aspirational good, but many Singaporeans will understand as well that in a hot and human climate like our own, being presentable and smelling normal would be something that many job seekers would require in order to have some dignity when they go for a job interview, or when they go to work.”

He also referred to Mr Chua’s statement in Parliament on Tuesday, where it was mentioned that ComCare has expanded its definition of basic needs to include items like mobile data plans.

Mr Chua defended this expansion by explaining that mobile data plans provide digital connectivity and human connection, both of which are considered basic needs.

He recounted conversations with two lower-income single mothers who expressed that items like perfume, jewellery, and overseas holidays were considered “good to have,” with the hope of affording them through hard work.

Mr. Chua stressed the agency, strength, and dignity of low-income families, highlighting their ability to break the cycle of poverty.

“Let us not underestimate the agency, the strength and the dignity of our low-income families and their ability to turn things around and to break the cycle of poverty,” he said.

Leader of the Opposition Pritam Singh (Aljunied GRC) inquired whether MSF would consider providing a higher payout to full-time caregivers who are unable to work.

Mr Chua explained that MSF officers assess each family and individual’s comprehensive situation before determining the necessary assistance.

Minimum Income Standard study reveals families need S$6,693 monthly to meet basic needs

MIS report 2023 unveils figures detailing the necessary income households require to maintain a basic standard of living, using the Minimum Income Standard (MIS) method.

The study also warned that although measures like the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) and Workfare Income Supplement (WIS) have had a positive impact, as noted by the study, they haven’t completely addressed the disparity.

The report detailed that:

  • The “reasonable starting point” for a living wage in Singapore was S$2,906 a month.
  • A single parent with a child aged two to six required S$3,218 per month.
  • Partnered parents with two children, one aged between seven and 12 and the other between 13 and 18, required S$6,426 a month.
  • A single elderly individual required S$1,421 a month.
  • Budgets for both single and partnered parent households averaged around S$1,600 per member. Given recent price inflation, these figures have risen by up to 5% in the current report.

Singapore Govt challenges MIS 2023 report’s representation of basic needs

Regrettably, on 14 September, the Finance Ministry (MOF), Manpower Ministry (MOM), and Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) jointly issued a statement dismissing the idea suggested by the report, claiming that minimum household income requirements amid inflation “might not accurately reflect basic needs”.

Instead, they claimed that findings should be seen as “what individuals would like to have.”

The Singapore government further defended their stances for the Progressive Wage Model (PWM) and other measures to uplift lower-wage workers, arguing that “a universal wage floor is not necessarily the best way” to ensure decent wages for lower-wage workers.

“Set too low, the wage floor will benefit fewer workers than the Progressive Wage Model (PWM). Set too high, workers who are less-skilled risk losing their jobs, especially if their jobs can be automated.”

The joint statement mentioned that tripartite partners have recently expanded the PWM to more sectors like retail, food services and waste management, as well as occupations like administrators and drivers.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
6 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

When you listen to these PAP stooges mumble, there can only be 2 outcome. First, they come on as arrogant chihuahuas. Second, they just don’t know what they’re talking about and fire away point blank.

People like this Chua fellow loves the sound of their voice.

And like all PAP drones, he manages to trumpet the company line with a straight face.

They are simply talking over the heads of Singaporeans and are oblivious to the difficulties Singaporeans face.

As Jamus Lim lamented, where is the poverty line? Let’s start with that.

But these “clever” drones will always have something to say and remain deaf to the needs of Singaporeans.

We have to wait only two years at most to send a convincing message to these ivory tower denizens.

Its really a big shame !!!!! sad truth

Why don’t go straight to the point?

I have a family to feed …. $1000 salary can afford HDB flat, and no bills to pay, no expenses? no transport fares to pay? no food costs? no phone bills to pay? no medical bills to pay? no education fees to pay for kids?

Come on its not April Fools Day !!! period

Eric Chua, if the Comcare was adequate, the suicidal rates won’ t be increasing. Why do you need to have various levels of “help?” When a simple process will be to give all. Singaporeans a basic allowance of $500/- a month when they reach 65 years, free transportation and medical fees. No need to have a complicated system. It does not show a clear mind at work.

Business people must be ashamed of themselves being
associated with this political party.

And to be in partnership with NTUC the ‘labour’ camp.

What is wrong to aspire for better life.. opposed to just living.??

Trending

Discover more from Gutzy Asia

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue Reading