Connect with us


Tharman stresses economic insight in debate on safeguarding reserves

A heated competition seems to be unfolding among four Presidential hopefuls regarding their capability to safeguard Singapore’s past reserves.

Even Tharman Shanmugaratnam, in a recent interview, emphasizes that reserve usage entails understanding beyond the ‘second key.’

However, netizens express doubts about Tharman’s independence due to his recent resignation from People’s Action Party (PAP) in June this year for PE 2023 candidacy.



SINGAPORE: A heated competition seems to be unfolding among four Presidential hopefuls regarding their capability to safeguard Singapore’s past reserves.

On Sunday (13 Aug), Presidential hopeful Ng Kok Song in an interview highlighted his extensive 45-year experience in shaping Singapore’s past reserves through public service roles, positioning himself as uniquely advantageous among competitors.

He pointedly emphasized that comprehending the intricacies of safeguarding Singapore’s past reserves is “not easy to understand”.

While Ng acknowledged that former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam is well-versed in the complexities of this task, he expressed his belief that the remaining potential candidates, Entrepreneur George Goh and former CEO of NTUC Income Tan Kin Lian, have yet to exhibit a comprehensive understanding.

Both Tan Kin Lian and George Goh rebuffed Ng’s statement, asserting their ability to effectively protect Singapore’s past reserves.

Tharman: the President needs to understand the economic and reserve-related issues

Even Mr Tharman himself weighed in on the debate. In a recent interview with The Straits Times on Friday (11 Aug), he emphasized that the power to release reserves isn’t the sole consideration.

The President must also comprehend the economic and reserve-related issues involved.

Tharman stressed that the decision-making process regarding reserves involves more than simply holding a “second key,” in which The government presents the situation to the President, and the latter decides whether to release the reserves or not.

“You’ve got to have a dialogue with the Government on it. And it helps to have a background where you have been deeply involved in economic policy. In fact, social policies as well are relevant, ” Mr Tharman said.

Furthermore, he underscored the need for an understanding of how to preserve reserves in a manner that serves both present and future generations, given the inevitability of future crises.

Tharman says decisions on reserve usage require “considered and calibrated judgments”

Tharman asserted that the President’s decisions on reserve usage require “considered and calibrated judgments”, rather than hasty reactions during times of crisis.

“How do we be fair to the current generation and future generations, both by protecting and using the reserves wisely in the future? We started now with Singa bonds for long-term infrastructure. That may not be the last of them,” he says.

Tharman said the President’s role in safeguarding reserves will only gain significance due to the impending challenges.

Tharman says his values remain ‘uncompromised’ all these years in government

Tharman Shanmugaratnam highlights his consistent independence and commitment to practical idealism throughout his career. He outlines his journey from youthful idealism to making adult decisions, including joining the government despite past disagreements.

“I’ve not had to compromise, all these years in government. I’ve never had to compromise my values and my basic motive for being in politics, which is to build a fairer and more socially just society. ”

“So when I say I am independent-minded, this is not something that I’m suddenly springing up with because of the presidential election. ”

“It goes back to my youth, it goes back to my career in the civil service, including the ups and downs I had, and how I stood my ground all the way through,” Tharman remarks.

Netizens expressed skepticism about Tharman’s independence from the PAP government

However, in the comments section of The Straits Times’ Facebook post, several netizens expressed scepticism about Tharman’s independence from the PAP government, considering his resignation from the PAP Cabinet in June to contest PE 2023.

A netizen questioned the extent of Tharman’s effectiveness and independence in fulfilling the role of a check and balance to the PAP-led government once elected as president.

The comment added that looking back at the tenure of Singapore’s inaugural elected president, the late Mr Ong Teng Cheong, often revered as the ‘People’s President’, may offer some insights.

While Tharman asserted in his interviews with The Straits Times that he and his PAP colleagues ” spent hours debating issues”, a sceptical comment pointed out a lack of instances where Tharman criticized policies during his time in office since 2001.

Meanwhile, a self-identified Taman Jurong grassroots leader shared personal experiences of interacting with Tharman, and recalled a memorable instance during a grassroots dinner in a General Election year when Tharman acknowledged the presence of capable individuals within the Opposition and expressed hope for their contributions to the nation’s progress.

A comment suggests that Tharman’s role might be better suited as a Senior Minister or even Prime Minister, given that the presidency is often seen as ceremonial.

“With due respect, we need an independent President to leverage against the Yes men. ” the comment wrote.

Interestingly, an earlier post by Tharman’s fellow presidential hopeful, George Goh, provided his perspective on the metaphorical representation of the President’s role as the ‘second key’ in terms of safeguarding reserves.

In this analogy, the primary key belongs to the PM and the cabinet, while the secondary key is positioned as the actual safeguard and oversight.

George Goh then asked, “Would you choose two other candidates whose key is exactly the same as the top key/executive? Or would you choose a truly different key?”

Tharman’s past role in releasing reserve twice amidst crisis

In times of crisis, Tharman’s involvement in the use of Singapore’s reserve was notable.

In 2008, during the global financial crisis caused by the United States housing bubble burst, he was the finance minister proposing a S$4.9 billion draw from past reserves to support jobs and encourage lending.

Additionally, he held a senior minister role, advising Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong on economic policies during the recent Covid-19 pandemic.

The government’s proposal to access S$69 billion of reserves to preserve jobs and lives was met with his guidance. Ultimately, S$39.7 billion was utilized from the reserves.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Given the substantial loss of S$30,800,000,000.00cents and S$7,000,000,000.00cents by MAS (Chairman -TS)and TH(Director -TS)respectively within the financial year ending 2023 and the alarming deteriorating governance which continue to infest our beloved SG,all voters will welcome someone not associated in whatever form or substance with the old “rotting mould”as SG newly minted President to assist in stopping the rot.In the coming PE ,,let us all SG voters including those new citizens do the needful to ensure the start of a new era!!!

Mayb show how to grow som hair so the country reserve$ can grow? Live 2b hapy…..

“I am independent-minded” – I quote Mr Tharman. Very Good. Mr Tharman is human and needs assurance. Our late Mr Ong Teng Cheong deserved more than what he should have had.

So WHAT? Are you trying to tell Singaporeans that your “INSIGHT” tells you that the reserves are in SERIOUS trouble and NEEDs your steady hand to safeguard them? If so, wouldn’t you have greater control and influence on the safeguarding of the reserves if you REMAINED in the PAP govt?

“Tharman: the President needs to understand the economic and reserve-related issues”

If this was required, why didn’t he voiced his concerned when Macik resigned to become our Pricksident. He wasn’t allowed to do so then in ParLeeMan? So what independent this fellow is talking about? He must be smoking something or too drunk from drinking.

He can have independent thinking but just have to keep to himself and follow the lead clown in the circus to stay relevant. That is smart independent thinking.


I’ve choose different key