Connect with us


Pritam Singh emphasizes due process in disagreement with motion to suspend Minister Iswaran

Pritam Singh, the Workers’ Party leader, vehemently opposed a motion from the Progress Singapore Party to suspend Transport Minister S Iswaran who is under investigation from CPIB.

He emphasized the importance of due process, asserting that justice must prevail before parliamentary actions are taken.



SINGAPORE: Pritam Singh, the leader of the Opposition representing the Workers’ Party, expressed opposition to a motion put forth by the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) regarding the suspension of Transport Minister Mr S Iswaran from the Parliament.

He stressed that in the Workers’ Party’s view, the wheels of justice must be allowed to fully turn before Parliament decides what to do.

“It would not just be unfair and premature, but significantly, this House would be seeking to overturn the electoral mandate given to Mr Iswaran by the people through the ballot box by prematurely passing judgment on him. ”

The motion, which was debated in the Singapore Parliament on Tuesday (19 September), was filed by PSP Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Hazel Poa on 7 September.

It called for Mr Iswaran’s suspension amidst ongoing investigations into allegations of corruption.

In addition, Ms Poa also introduces a Private Member’s Bill to amend the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act 1962, which seeks to provide Parliament with the power to back-pay the MP allowance that was withheld from an MP who has been suspended from the service of Parliament.

Both Ms Poa’s motion and bill were rejected by the Parliament.

Mr Singh stresses the rule of law as crucial factor in debunking Ms Poa’s proposal

In his speech, Mr Singh who is also the Workers’ Party chief, said there are two key issues for Parliament to consider.

First, whether it is fair and proper for a duly elected Member of Parliament to be suspended from responsibilities towards his or her constituents and legislative duties before due process is concluded.

Second, what Parliament ought to do when a Member of Parliament has been effectively interdicted from MP duties arising from actions taken by his or her Party leader.

Notably, Mr Pritam Singh and Mr Faisal Manap, both MPs of the Workers’ Party, are presently under investigation in relation to the findings arising from the Committee of Privileges Inquiry concerning a complaint involving Miss Raeesah Khan.

While Ms Poa suggested that an MP should be suspended from Parliament because he has been arrested and is being investigated for the serious offence of corruption, Mr Singh argued that the centrality of the rule of law in Singapore renders her suggested course of action premature.

“A point made all the more stark because we do not even know the details of what Mr Iswaran is accused of. Parliament should be mindful of the dictum of presumption of innocence.”

He also requested the PSP colleagues to consider the precedent their motion would create should a future government decide to fix opposition MPs by way of politically-motivated investigations.

Turning to the matter of Mr Iswaran’s MP allowance, Mr Singh suggested that while suspension from Parliament might not be appropriate, suspending the payment of the allowance could be considered.

He referred to concerns among the public, who are puzzled by Mr Iswaran’s continued collection of his allowance despite his absence from parliamentary and constituency duties.

Mr Singh grills the Leader of the House with crucial questions on Mr Iswaran’s Parliamentary status

Mr Singh further raised several questions for the Leader of the House to address. He inquired whether Mr Iswaran’s ban on entering government buildings extended to Parliament House.

He also asked whether Mr Iswaran had access to the Public Service Division’s Member of Parliament Appeal System and whether he was expected to assist his constituents in his capacity as an MP.

Furthermore, Mr Singh sought clarification on whether the motion contemplated a clawback of Mr Iswaran’s MP allowance for the period during which he had not performed MP duties, which he argued would be a reasonable expectation of the public.

He also challenged the leader’s motion, which says that this House will consider this matter when “the outcome of ongoing investigations is known”.

“This contrasts with what the Prime Minister said during the clarifications of the Prime Minister’s Ministerial Statement on Mr Iswaran last month. The PM said and I quote, “if there is a case, the case has not been heard, he has not been found guilty or acquitted or whatever.””

He asked whether the House would consider the matter once investigations were completed and a decision was made regarding charges against Mr Iswaran or only upon the conclusion of the entire criminal justice process, including any possible appeals.

The PPIPA currently lacks provisions for suspending allowances, says Ms Indranee

In response to Mr Singh’s query, Ms Indranee Rajah, the Leader of the House, acknowledged that Mr Singh’s second question revolved around the appropriate measures Parliament should take during the interim period.

However, Ms Indranee pointed out a significant challenge with this proposal, alluding to the fact that the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act 1962 (PPIPA) currently lacks provisions for suspending allowances.

“The difficulty with that and this is what Ms Poa was alluding to, is that there’s no provision in the PPIPA currently to suspend allowance.”

She explained that the existing law adopts a binary approach, where a sitting MP receives the full allowance, while a suspended member receives none. Consequently, the law does not provide for any intermediate measures.

“If the member is suspended, then he doesn’t get any allowance. so the law does not provide for anything in between.”

Ms Indranee advocated for waiting until the investigation concluded to gain a clearer understanding of the appropriate course of action.

She further elaborated on the steps to be taken regarding the monies paid to Mr Iswaran.

According to her, a decision would be revisited when the Attorney General’s Chambers revealed whether they intended to bring charges against him and, if so, the nature of those charges.

“We will look at it again when we know if the Attorney General’s Chambers intends to bring any charges, and if so what the charges are, we will consider a claw back if Justified, ” she said.

“If Mr Iswaran being charged, the Prime Minister will consider the allegations the accusations against him, and decide whether to make him resign and to pay back both salary and allowance without waiting for legal process.”

This action would be grounded in PAP’s party discipline, as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who is also the ruling party chief, would perceive it as a failure to meet party standards and conduct, irrespective of any criminal allegations.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I believed that the investigation of the former transport minister commiting alleged corruption need to b updated to the public.

Where to find this kind of job? no work still got pay…tsk tsk tsk

My butt is itchy to say, it feels he will be set free. Why? Just my itchy backside feeling only, need to explain meh?

86% says it all. A hopeless case.

Rape Case got No Answers Yet????
Tan Kin Lian say pretty girl, Aware Come Out Flying with Burning Stakes.

Pritam you are right.Iswaran is an elected MP, we should wait for CpIB to fully investigate & expediently as well.
Stopping his allowance of $8500, is a good thing, it can be reimbursed anyway.
Now, What Happened To Reeshah Khan’s Sexual Assault????
When is the perpetrator coming to face justice???
Why isn’t Aware taking this Ex-MPs sexual assault seriously & Questioning Shanmugam & his Police Department for Answers.
What is Shanmugam Doing????

Pritam: I don’t see the iron in you like LTK. Or compared to PSP or LMW, Hazel Poa, etc. What do you think?

Good luck to your next elections.

Pritam will be voted out in the next GE. Mark my words.

Pritam is flailing and squealing like a chicken

Can IR tell us if MPS that were arrested using the ISD in the past continued to receive their MP allowances as no due process of Law was accorded to them? Some were held as long as thirty years.

CPIB still investigating Hmmmm. By now some charges should have laid out.
What is the delay. Especially for such a high profile person.

One side Political Prisoners , the other side Slavery. Which is the so call good choice for the ppl. Pui! Greed knows no boundary, even the Wall cannot keep the greedy heart down.

Really? How about Political Prisoner who are held against their will and politicians just spin stories/narratives for their own Scapegoating Game? Should all these political prisoner be paid as well?!?