Pritam Singh emphasizes due process in disagreement with motion to suspend Minister Iswaran

SINGAPORE: Pritam Singh, the leader of the Opposition representing the Workers’ Party, expressed opposition to a motion put forth by the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) regarding the suspension of Transport Minister Mr S Iswaran from the Parliament.

He stressed that in the Workers’ Party’s view, the wheels of justice must be allowed to fully turn before Parliament decides what to do.

“It would not just be unfair and premature, but significantly, this House would be seeking to overturn the electoral mandate given to Mr Iswaran by the people through the ballot box by prematurely passing judgment on him. ”

The motion, which was debated in the Singapore Parliament on Tuesday (19 September), was filed by PSP Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Hazel Poa on 7 September.

It called for Mr Iswaran’s suspension amidst ongoing investigations into allegations of corruption.

In addition, Ms Poa also introduces a Private Member’s Bill to amend the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act 1962, which seeks to provide Parliament with the power to back-pay the MP allowance that was withheld from an MP who has been suspended from the service of Parliament.

Both Ms Poa’s motion and bill were rejected by the Parliament.

Mr Singh stresses the rule of law as crucial factor in debunking Ms Poa’s proposal

In his speech, Mr Singh who is also the Workers’ Party chief, said there are two key issues for Parliament to consider.

First, whether it is fair and proper for a duly elected Member of Parliament to be suspended from responsibilities towards his or her constituents and legislative duties before due process is concluded.

Second, what Parliament ought to do when a Member of Parliament has been effectively interdicted from MP duties arising from actions taken by his or her Party leader.

Notably, Mr Pritam Singh and Mr Faisal Manap, both MPs of the Workers’ Party, are presently under investigation in relation to the findings arising from the Committee of Privileges Inquiry concerning a complaint involving Miss Raeesah Khan.

While Ms Poa suggested that an MP should be suspended from Parliament because he has been arrested and is being investigated for the serious offence of corruption, Mr Singh argued that the centrality of the rule of law in Singapore renders her suggested course of action premature.

“A point made all the more stark because we do not even know the details of what Mr Iswaran is accused of. Parliament should be mindful of the dictum of presumption of innocence.”

He also requested the PSP colleagues to consider the precedent their motion would create should a future government decide to fix opposition MPs by way of politically-motivated investigations.

Turning to the matter of Mr Iswaran’s MP allowance, Mr Singh suggested that while suspension from Parliament might not be appropriate, suspending the payment of the allowance could be considered.

He referred to concerns among the public, who are puzzled by Mr Iswaran’s continued collection of his allowance despite his absence from parliamentary and constituency duties.

Mr Singh grills the Leader of the House with crucial questions on Mr Iswaran’s Parliamentary status

Mr Singh further raised several questions for the Leader of the House to address. He inquired whether Mr Iswaran’s ban on entering government buildings extended to Parliament House.

He also asked whether Mr Iswaran had access to the Public Service Division’s Member of Parliament Appeal System and whether he was expected to assist his constituents in his capacity as an MP.

Furthermore, Mr Singh sought clarification on whether the motion contemplated a clawback of Mr Iswaran’s MP allowance for the period during which he had not performed MP duties, which he argued would be a reasonable expectation of the public.

He also challenged the leader’s motion, which says that this House will consider this matter when “the outcome of ongoing investigations is known”.

“This contrasts with what the Prime Minister said during the clarifications of the Prime Minister’s Ministerial Statement on Mr Iswaran last month. The PM said and I quote, “if there is a case, the case has not been heard, he has not been found guilty or acquitted or whatever.””

He asked whether the House would consider the matter once investigations were completed and a decision was made regarding charges against Mr Iswaran or only upon the conclusion of the entire criminal justice process, including any possible appeals.

The PPIPA currently lacks provisions for suspending allowances, says Ms Indranee

In response to Mr Singh’s query, Ms Indranee Rajah, the Leader of the House, acknowledged that Mr Singh’s second question revolved around the appropriate measures Parliament should take during the interim period.

However, Ms Indranee pointed out a significant challenge with this proposal, alluding to the fact that the Parliament (Privileges, Immunities and Powers) Act 1962 (PPIPA) currently lacks provisions for suspending allowances.

“The difficulty with that and this is what Ms Poa was alluding to, is that there’s no provision in the PPIPA currently to suspend allowance.”

She explained that the existing law adopts a binary approach, where a sitting MP receives the full allowance, while a suspended member receives none. Consequently, the law does not provide for any intermediate measures.

“If the member is suspended, then he doesn’t get any allowance. so the law does not provide for anything in between.”

Ms Indranee advocated for waiting until the investigation concluded to gain a clearer understanding of the appropriate course of action.

She further elaborated on the steps to be taken regarding the monies paid to Mr Iswaran.

According to her, a decision would be revisited when the Attorney General’s Chambers revealed whether they intended to bring charges against him and, if so, the nature of those charges.

“We will look at it again when we know if the Attorney General’s Chambers intends to bring any charges, and if so what the charges are, we will consider a claw back if Justified, ” she said.

“If Mr Iswaran being charged, the Prime Minister will consider the allegations the accusations against him, and decide whether to make him resign and to pay back both salary and allowance without waiting for legal process.”

This action would be grounded in PAP’s party discipline, as Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who is also the ruling party chief, would perceive it as a failure to meet party standards and conduct, irrespective of any criminal allegations.

Latest posts

Ginger cat seeks treatment at a Malaysian hospital, netizens laud staff for assistance

An ginger cat, with an injured paw, caught TikTok users' attention as it headed to a Selangor public hospital's emergency department, seeking treatment. A compassionate nurse promptly aided the cat, dressing its paw in a treatment room.

Indonesia’s minister touts robust post-Covid-19 economic recovery with consistent 5% growth

Indonesia's Coordinating Minister, Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan, touts the nation's robust post-pandemic economic recovery at the UAE-Indonesia Economic Business Forum 2023, highlighting strong growth and investment potential.

Indonesian TikTok Influencer sentenced to 2 years in prison for controversial TikTok video on...

In a landmark ruling, Lina Mukherjee, an Indonesian TikTok influencer, has been sentenced to two years in prison and fined IDR 250 million (US$16,200) for her contentious video, where she uttered "bismillah" before eating pork, igniting a debate on religious insensitivity in Indonesia.

PDIP’s Ganjar Pranowo hints at potential alliance with Prabowo Subianto for 2024 Indonesian Presidential...

The potential partnership between Ganjar Pranowo of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP) and Prabowo Subianto in the 2024 Presidential Election is a topic of discussion. At a recent campaign meeting, Pranowo acknowledged the ongoing discourse and stressed that in politics, "anything is possible" until confirmed by the General Election Commission (KPU).

Is the withdrawal of access blocking direction of East Asia Forum, an example of...

In the recent reversal involving POFMA and the East Asia Forum, Singapore's legal approach has raised questions. The differential treatment between local and foreign entities, combined with apparent selective enforcement, raises concerns about the nation's commitment to the rule of law versus the rule by law.

Trial begins for Chinese #MeToo journalist, labour activist

Chinese activists Sophia Huang Xueqin and Wang Jianbing face trial for "inciting subversion of state power," raising health concerns after two years in detention. The closed-door trial heightens worries about China's shrinking civil society space.

Geylang restaurant seeks customers overcharged with S$840 instead of S$84 due to typo error

A Geylang restaurant, Fok Lok Kee Private Kitchen, accidentally overcharged two customers, seeking them through social media for a refund of S$840. Despite being given a receipt, customers hadn't returned after two days. The restaurant turned to social media for help. They plan to contact the card company for a partial refund if needed. The delay in their Facebook post was said to be unintentional and clarified to be due to discrepancies in posting and transaction dates. Fortunately, the issue has been resolved using PayNow instead of the bank refund process.

Popular posts

Chinese tourist discovers hidden cameras in Kota Kinabalu Airbnb during honeymoon

During her honeymoon in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, a Chinese national woman uncovered hidden cameras in her Airbnb accommodation, sparking concerns about privacy and safety while traveling. The discovery left both her and her husband deeply distressed.

Tourist files police report over S$900 crab bill at Seafood Paradise; restaurant responds with...

Japanese tourist Junko Shinba and her group faced a pricing dispute at Seafood Paradise in Clarke Quay when ordering chili crab. They claimed the restaurant staff failed to clarify the pricing of the Alaskan King Crab, leading to a shocking bill of $938 for the crab dish alone. The total bill was $1,322.37. Shinba requested police intervention, and the restaurant offered a $107.40 discount. However, the Paradise Group, which owns the restaurant, disputed her claims, stating they communicated the price and weight clearly. The Consumers Association of Singapore is investigating the incident.

Singapore finance influencer uses S$10 Lee Kuan Yew coin for payment, baffles cashiers

Finance influencer Seth Wee embarked on an unorthodox mission to test the practicality of Singapore's LKY100 commemorative coin. His quirky payment experiment left cashiers bewildered and sparked questions about the coin's legal tender status.

Runner Soh Rui Yong confirms his absence from Asian Games, extends best wishes to...

Singaporean record breaking long-distance runner Soh Rui Yong has reaffirmed his absence from the upcoming Asian Games as Singapore Athletics has announced its team for the competition held in Hangzhou, China. Despite appeals backed by Singapore Athletics in July this year, the Singapore National Olympic Council's decision remained unaltered. Nonetheless, Mr Soh remains positive and extends best wishes to his fellow Singapore Athletics teammates

Mid-Autumn lantern decoration mishap in Chinatown disrupts double-decker buses

Singapore's vibrant Chinatown, affectionately known as "牛车水," recently dazzled with Mid-Autumn Festival decorations. However, a lantern decoration on Upper Cross Street came loose, leading to double-decker bus disruptions and commuter frustrations on Thursday.


Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments