Court Cases
US court rules in favour of Montana youths in a historic climate lawsuit
Montana youths achieve a legal triumph as a judge rules that the state’s failure to consider climate impacts in approving fossil fuel projects breaches the constitution. This landmark “Held v. Montana” case contributes to the fight against climate-disrupting activities, marking a pivotal moment in addressing environmental concerns.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2023/08/17062958/Youth-plaintiffs-in-Held-v.-Stat-e1692089375858.jpg)
UNITED STATES:In a significant legal victory, a group of youth in Montana has achieved success in a landmark lawsuit, according to The New York Times.
The court found that young people have a constitutional right to a healthful environment and that the state must consider potential climate damage when approving projects.
The ruling by a judge states that the state’s failure to account for climate change impacts when authorizing fossil fuel projects violates the US Constitution.
The case, known as Held v. Montana, arrives amid a season of extreme heat and deadly wildfires.
The court’s decision represents a milestone in the broader campaign against government endorsement of coal, oil, and gas activities, which contribute to rapid global warming.
Julia Olson, the founder of Our Children’s Trust, a legal nonprofit that led the case on behalf of the youth, hailed the verdict as a turning point in combating the devastating consequences of human-induced climate disruptions.
The ruling mandates Montana, a notable coal and gas producer, to factor climate considerations into decisions concerning the approval or renewal of fossil fuel projects.
While the Montana attorney general’s office plans to appeal the decision, experts predict that this ruling will have far-reaching implications, influencing similar climate litigation cases worldwide.
The case centred on language within Montana’s constitution guaranteeing residents a clean and healthful environment and obligating the state to preserve and enhance the environment for present and future generations.
This Montana case is part of a larger wave of legal actions related to climate change, targeting both corporations and governments globally.
The decision is expected to serve as a precedent for future climate litigation, reinforcing the link between emissions, climate harm, and individual experiences of these effects.
As climate-related lawsuits continue to gain momentum, the ruling underscores the growing urgency to address climate concerns in legal proceedings and policymaking.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Singapore4 days ago
Dr Tommy Koh: “INCOME and Fairprice should never be sold”
-
Business2 days ago
Concerns over conflict of interest and corporate governance arise in Income’s sale to Allianz
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Youngest self-radicalised Singaporean and 33-yr-old former public servant issued restriction order under ISA
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Voters interviewed at West Coast GRC, expressed hope for PSP representation in Parliament
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore’s birth rates decline by 5.8% as total fertility rate drops below 1
-
International2 weeks ago
Attempted assassination at Donald Trump rally in Pennsylvania: Shooter and one attendee dead, two critically injured
-
Singapore1 week ago
AGO Report reveals lapses in MOE’s school projects; Police report filed over possible falsifications
-
Singapore2 days ago
NTUC Enterprise Chairman assures affordable insurance for lower-income customers amid Allianz deal concerns