Connect with us


The hidden costs of the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement

In this opinion piece, Foong Swee Fong challenges the popular perception of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA) as a uniformly positive development for Singapore. While mainstream narratives celebrate the increase in trade, employment, and technological advancement tied to the agreement, Fong highlights significant drawbacks that have been largely ignored.



Minister Gan Kim Yong at a reception commemorating the 20th anniversary of the US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, alongside US Trade Representative (USTR) Ambassador Katherine Tai and USABC President and CEO Ambassador Ted Osius. (Photo: MTI)

by Foong Swee Fong

The mainstream media likes to paint a glowing picture of the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (USSFTA), claiming that Singapore has benefited enormously from it, be it trade, employment, technological advancement, or even national security.

However, there are many downsides for Singaporeans that it will never mention.

For consumers, the clause on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) has been the most damaging.

By signing the treaty, Singapore has accepted a regime to stringently protect the IPRs of American companies including severely punishing people who infringe their patents, minimizing generics and banning parallel imports, extending patent durations, lowering the bar to grant patents, over and beyond what is required by the World Trade Organization (WTO).

The result is that prices of medicines, chemicals, software, movies, music, branded merchandise and any product that has some new intellectual component, have become extremely expensive because these companies will charge what we can bear given that the government has surrendered our bargaining power.

Other ASEAN countries, all of which did not sign an FTA with the US, have managed to keep IPR products reasonably priced because they did not undertake to limit their access to generics, to ban parallel imports or even to refrain from overriding a patent in the interest of the country.

In 2006 and 2007, the Thai government issued compulsory licenses, ie, used existing patents without the permission of the holder but with reasonable compensation, which is permitted under WTO rules, to produce cheaper drugs for heart disease and HIV, as the original drugs were too expensive and patients were dying as they couldn’t afford them.

Ironically, prior to 1898, when the US finally became a net exporter of patents, they took the view that all new inventions belong to the human race, and copying was par for course, as did the Japanese and Chinese until they became net exporters of patents.

Are Singaporeans and Singapore companies anywhere near being net exporter of patent? If not, why roll over and expose ourselves to vultures?

Of course, big investors and land owners, especially Temasek has benefited enormously from the influx of intellectual property companies into Singapore, including pharmaceutical companies.

Another troubling issue in the FTA is the clause to eradicate capital control. Thus, Americans can invest in or divest Singapore assets at will, so asset prices here, especially property, have been inflated beyond the means of Singaporeans each time the US government prints more money to support its spending or to bail out failing US companies.

From 2008 to 2015, the US central bank (Fed) printed about US$3.5 trillion. To put it in perspective, that’s about 3.5 times what it printed in the first 95 years of its existence! Then in the two years from 2020 to 2021, it printed north of US$5 trillion to fight the Covid pandemic and its fallout, which is more than 5 times what it printed in the first 95 years of its existence!

The inflation that people all over the world are experiencing now is due, in no small measure, to the profligate behaviour of the US government. Inflation, at the end of the day, is always a case of too much money chasing after too few goods.

The effect on property is most obvious. Shortly after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, property prices here increased sharply, because, as mentioned earlier, the Fed printed 3.5 trillion dollars and some of those money found its way here.

Then, shortly after Covid, around 2022, property prices here again began to increase sharply, because the Fed printed north of US$5 trillion dollars in the preceding two years. Some of those money found its way here because Singapore is a safe haven and the USSFTA commits Singapore to the free transfer of capital, unimpeded by regulatory restrictions.

Worse still, the Singapore government’s effort to put a lid on skyrocketing property prices by imposing a 60% Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) on foreigners was compromised by the USSFTA because some smart negotiator had agreed to grant the Americans National Treatment, ie, same treatment as Singaporeans, with regards to investments, including property, which should have been carved out, given how land scarce we are.

Thus Americans, like Singaporeans, do not have to pay ABSD for their first property here. This special treatment is exclusive to the Americans and members of the European Free Trade Arrangement comprising Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. Fortunately for us, that short-sighted clause has been carved out from the other 25 FTAs that we have signed.

Not surprisingly, Americans have become the top foreign buyers of property here, leapfrogging the Chinese as the Additional Buyer’s Stamp Duty (ABSD) increased, although the scale of purchases has not reached that of previous years.

Now that inflation is rearing its ugly head and causing voters to be unhappy, the Fed is raising interest rates to absorb the excess money. If interest rates remain high long enough, and other factors remaining constant, we shall be seeing asset prices making a sharp reversal, causing much hardship to Singaporeans. But having signed the USSFTA, we have little means to protect ourselves from the reckless policies of the US government.

Another area of concern is workers’ rights and the environment.

Although the USSFTA purports to uphold workers’ rights and protect the environment, it is toothless to uphold those principles because it cleverly leaves the final say on the matter to the Singapore government, which has been soft in the face of investor demands.

It is, therefore, no coincidence that we are having more and more foreign workers and professionals here to ensure that wages are “competitive” and that workers are insecure so that they will work hard. The government’s call for work-life balance is nothing short of hypocrisy.

Incidentally, the USSFTA has a clause that does not limit the number of American professionals entering Singapore but limits the number of Singaporean professionals entering the US to 5,400 a year.

Given that we are a Little Red Dot and the US is the largest economy in the world, shouldn’t the arrangement be the other way around? Which negotiator agreed to this ridiculous clause?

According to the Straits Times, since the inception of the USSFTA, trade between the two countries has tripled from US$40 billion in 2003 to US$120 billion in 2022. However, much of it accrues to US MNCs rather than Singapore companies, given that there are 6000 US companies here and only 400 Singapore companies in the US. Thus, although trade has increased, a lot of the profits would arguably have been repatriated to the US.

Also, it is debatable how much of the increase in “trade” is due to the internal transfer of parts of an MNC, from Singapore to the US and vice-versa, taking advantage of the zero-tariff of the FTA, as part of supply chain management. On paper, such movement of parts is recorded as trade, but in reality, it is just movement of inventory, which, nonetheless, takes up valuable resources here which could have been put to better use, given that Singapore is so small.

Thus, although trade has increased, the opportunity cost to Singapore is very high because the overwhelming presence of US companies here taking advantage of the USSFTA has made it difficult for Singaporean companies to compete for resources to grow their business, given that they are considerably smaller, less sophisticated and are financially weaker. Besides, foreign MNCs are usually given attractive incentives to invest here.

Is it any wonder, then, that we have not produced any noteworthy company since the signing of the USSFTA in 2003?

The mainstream media states that “to date, the deal remains the US’ only FTA with an ASEAN country”, as if Singapore is very lucky to have signed the treaty with the US or that it is the only country worthy enough to sign the treaty. Nothing is further from the truth.

After signing the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with Mexico and Canada, the US was eager to impose a similar trade blueprint on ASEAN.

After Singapore, they thought the rest of the ASEAN countries would follow suit. Malaysia and Thailand entered into negotiations with the US, but soon found that the deal was disadvantageous to them and pulled out. The other ASEAN countries noted that the US is far more powerful than them and that any trade treaty would be lopsided; thus, they wisely did not enter into any negotiations.

I thus cringe every time Singapore ministers or Singapore ambassadors unabashedly rehash the story of how then-PM Goh Chok Tong manoeuvred then-President Clinton to a game of golf in Brunei in the wee hours of the morning and got him to agree to start negotiations on the USSFTA in 20 minutes, as if the US were all along nonchalant about the FTA.

In all probability, the US was very keen to get Singapore locked-in into a treaty, especially the draconian terms pertaining to intellectual property rights.

Although the mainstream media likes to paint a rosy picture of the USSFTA, the reality is more nuanced. Investors definitely are having it good since the treaty protects their rights.

However, for the majority of the population, the effect has been less rosy, even detrimental. Worse still, the treaty has tied our hands, and thereby compromised our sovereignty.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Actually FTA is not supported by all true Americans, it is an idea more from Democrats than Republican. This is also one of the reasons why D Trump is in favor for those supporting nationalism. Due to QE, there is a spike of USD all over the world. Even the “non Americans” are buying “expensive things” using USD, it is highly portable and more receptive world wide compared to the other currencies. The sad part comes when QE is met with wars where supplies of goods are downward affected. With abundant of cash and limited goods, price goes up exponentially… Read more »

Nothing is “free” in this world …

Last edited 17 days ago by W.A.J.

Free Trade Agreements are based on compromise, Singapore can’t get it all. Especially when the ruling government through its incompetence has placed Singapore in a weaker position. I think the author is exaggerating inflows of US money into Singapore. Americans would rather invest in their home country, the same is true for everyone else too. That is why when the US Federal Reserve raises its interest rate, capital generally flows from the rest of the world to the US. I believe many of these “Americans” that choose to dump their money into Singapore were originally from a country with five… Read more »

Last edited 16 days ago by Blankslate

xx -Singapore Free Trade Agreement

Who’s the champion who came up with this idea??!!

A well written passage and likely to be picked on by pap them poopma whatever possible. fta aka fuck up agreement is something pap has always supported in full forced and lhl had been trying his very best to sell the idea to stupid Singaporeans.  Over these years, it has benefitted large companies like Temasuck but the promised money had never trickled down to the people. The conditions that came with the fta have caused more suffering to us locals such as jobs losses … false inflation … etc. basically pap has caused Singapore and it’s people holding on to… Read more »

FTA or no, it’s irrelevant, basically it’s political game of fraud of the PAP Deception to the sheeps. From the 1970s plywood factories like Starlight Timber, garment factories, like Pacific and Ocean Garments, behemoths like GE, the 7 or 8 branches of Matsushita/Panasonic/Quasar, also similar like 7 branches of giant Sony and son on, of all their decades here to op in SG, WHAT HAS REALLY MATTERED AND GAIN for Millions ofSheeps. Ask ourselves this IMPORTANT QUESTION – has a SG Matsushita borned, Has a Singaorean GE took off TO TAKE ON the World since MNCs SUPPOSED to Transfer Tech… Read more »

All these economic policies are core to the Kayu Son’s fallacy that economic growth will bring to SG (or rather to himself) happiness and glory. True, we need money to survive nowadays, to be seen as been plugged into the global system. But to think money/wealth/power will BUY everything is just a fool’s dream. And what a bloody fool that must be given that Ownself Pays Ownself the highest salary in the world, and a super-long runway – yet still cannot fly high. Did power buy him conciliation with his own siblings? Or made it worse? Did money buy him… Read more »

I worked a few hours online for this internet job last month and received $17529. Start making extra money online by simply following these guidelines.

𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐇𝐞𝐫𝐞…. 𝐖­­𝐰­­𝐰­­.­­𝐩­­𝐚­­𝐲­­𝐬­­𝟕­­𝟕­­.­­𝐜­­𝐨­­𝐦

Again, Singaporeans should better educate themselves, stop taking blindly occasional news from the MSM or MTI. The bulk of the FDI into SG is not from US, nor China, nor the MNCs, etc. It is from banana countries like the Cayman Islands and Virgins Islands.

People are happier if they are more financially independent. Make 120 to 180USD / Hr by performing simple tasks. We can help you achieve this. Join our strong community and earn money easily and safely from wherever you want….

Take a look…………………. 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐒𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐀𝐩𝐩𝟏.𝐜𝐨𝐦

You think this FTA with the US is bad? What about that CECA agreement done while in a fog with India “fever”? Luckily there are no agitators for an independent Kalistan resident here or we might find ourselves in Canada’s shoes.

In SG, there are 7 out of 10 working adults are graduates of some kinds. Some even from the best of the best universities around the world! But when it come to thinking, they are just idiots! These graduates preferred to be fed with handouts and vouchers from the government. They preferred FTs given jobs by the PAP and they wait at home for the handouts and vouchers. They believe they should go for upgrading and upskilling but just so they can drive PHVs. Those degrees they obtained were useless compare to some questionable qualification from unknown universities. They want… Read more »

American companies may not be paying taxes in Singapore if invoicing is not done here. They may run an overdraft account here backed by the US bank account and thus not pay taxes while enjoying all the various perks given to them by our colonial mindset ruling party. Some say stupidly has no cure. In Singapore we get a dose daily like the cod liver emulsion our grandmas forced down our throats. At least that had medicinal value.

Of all written, the ink is on the wall! Good Piece and many locals, Singaporeans should read and digest what’s said, in lay man term and wording. As said, many US citizens abode in Singapore share and enjoy the same status as locals, any wonder who are the “Americans”? regardless the skin of the color, whom chinese immigrants residing is on main influx.