by Teo Kueh Liang
I refer to TODAY’s Commentary, “’Not in my backyard’ — when some groups can protest more loudly, the most vulnerable ones suffer” (Jan 25, 2024).
A few good points from the article are worth to be probed further and discussed.
In December 2023, the announcement of plans by The National Environment Agency (NEA) to build a new columbarium in Mandai was really snookered by some nearby residents.
While most Singaporeans accept that spaces for the dead (such as Crematoriums and Columbariums), spaces for Elder Care Facilities (various old folks homes and nursing homes) and spaces for foreign workers (dormitories) are needed, many do not want them built close to where we live.
Thus, the thought and attitude of having ‘not in my backyard’ further identifies the selfishness, self-centeredness, prejudice and ignorance of human nature.
Singapore has been facing the issue of land scarcity (merely a total land area of 734.3 square kilometres) and shortages of natural resources, hence, it opts to be fully commercialised, industrialised and relying upon its export-oriented economy for its survival and prosperity. Inevitably, it is heavily compact and urbanised.
Similarly, Singapore lacks space for graveyard usage. Thus, the relevant authority has to strongly advocate the importance of crematorium funerals as the replacement for burial funerals. Also, the Government has to extend the present Mandai crematorium and columbarium facility to its neighbouring areas.
If we buy the arguments from the objectors who cite apprehensions about the negative effects of new developments such as increased noise, traffic congestion and loss of open spaces as reasonable excuses, then we would set a bad example for the people to use this incident as an excuse for avoidance with any future similar or related developments.
For example: Would it be fair and reasonable for people who live in private residential properties and HDB flats near Changi Airport, Changi Prison Complex and Drug Rehabilitation Center (DRC)/Addiction Treatment Center to complain, rant or whine about similar situations or reasons as mentioned above?
In short, it is quite reasonable and effective for labelling an act as Nimby-ism is similarly an accusation of individuals being narrowly self-interested and harming the broader public good because they oppose the siting of undesired facilities near their homes.
Singapore to invest S$100M in upgrading broadband network to 10Gbps
Draft imposed by Myanmar’s military junta raises alarm, UN expert calls for action
ASEAN parliamentarians voice concern over Indonesian election integrity
ECDA imposes S$10,000 fine on Kinderland for child management lapses
LTA apprehends four drivers for illegal cross-border chauffeur services
COE prices slide in latest tender, commercial vehicle premiums rise
“SING FOR PALESTINE” private event scheduled for 25 February in Singapore
Malaysian govt warns of ‘brain drain’ as skilled workers seek opportunities abroad
HDB unveils 4,000+ BTO flats in first 2024 sale
29,000 nurses to receive up to S$100,000 in MOH’s new retention scheme
Malaysian ringgit hits new low, RM3.56 to Singapore dollar
Jack Ma’s wife reportedly acquires three Duxton Road shophouses for S$50M
Singapore2 weeks ago
PM Lee encourages more births in the year of the dragon amid declining fertility rates
Singapore1 week ago
Singapore surpasses nursing recruitment target in 2023 amidst high attrition rates
Featured7 days ago
PA surveys community & govt confidence amid pending general election
Comments1 week ago
PAP Marcus Loh accuses WP’s MP of alleged dishonesty on debate about reserves
Civil Society1 week ago
Singaporeans stand firm in support for Palestine amidst police scrutiny
Civil Society5 days ago
At least 9 individuals summoned by police over Palestine solidarity activities on 2 Feb
Community1 week ago
Connectivity struggles in Tengah town prompt online user discussion
International1 week ago
Singapore Police investigate two events amid Israel’s genocide in Gaza