Politics
Red Dot United calls for Independent Electoral Boundaries Review Committee
Red Dot United urges an independent body to lead Singapore’s Electoral Boundaries Review Committee, following concerns over gerrymandering raised by PSP NCMPs. RDU proposes the President appoint EBRC members to ensure transparency and impartiality in the electoral process.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2024/08/15113130/RDU-election.png)
Red Dot United (RDU) has issued a strong call for Singapore’s Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) to be led by an independent body, rather than being managed by the civil service under the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO).
This appeal was articulated in a detailed statement released by the party on Wednesday (14 Aug), following concerns raised by Progress Singapore Party (PSP) Non-Constituency Members of Parliament (NCMPs) about gerrymandering in the recent parliamentary debate.
RDU’s statement, titled “Ensuring Fairness in Singapore’s Electoral Boundaries Review Process: A Call for Independence and Transparency,” argues that the current structure of the EBRC raises questions about its impartiality.
“The EBRC, as it stands, is perceived to be under the influence of the ruling party, given that the Elections Department is housed within the PMO. This setup creates a potential conflict of interest that undermines public confidence in the fairness of our electoral processes,” the statement reads.
The party pointed to historical incidents, such as the creation of MacPherson Single Member Constituency (SMC) in 1994 at the request of then-Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, as evidence of possible political influence.
“The MacPherson SMC incident is a stark reminder that political considerations have, in the past, influenced the drawing of electoral boundaries. This is precisely why we need an independent body to oversee the process,” RDU emphasized.
RDU further criticized the current process, stating that it lacks transparency and accountability. “Without clear explanations and justifications for the changes in electoral boundaries, the public is left in the dark. This secrecy erodes trust and fuels suspicions of gerrymandering,” the statement continued.
To address these concerns, RDU proposed that the electoral boundaries review process be managed by an independent committee outside of the PMO’s control.
The party suggested that the President of Singapore should convene the EBRC and appoint its members from various agencies, to ensure a balanced and transparent process. “By having the President appoint the committee members, we can introduce a layer of neutrality and ensure that the review process is free from political influence,” RDU stated.
RDU also called for the EBRC to include detailed justifications for any boundary changes in its reports, supported by factual data. “Transparency is key to maintaining public trust. The EBRC should explain why boundaries are redrawn, with facts and figures to support their decisions. This would not only enhance accountability but also reassure the public that the process is fair,” the party argued.
This call from RDU comes on the heels of a motion put forward by PSP NCMPs last week, where Ms Hazel Poa described gerrymandering as “an act of disrespect for voters.” In response to these concerns, Minister-in-charge of the Public Service Mr Chan Chun Sing defended the EBRC’s independence, stating that the committee operates objectively and is insulated from party politics.
He emphasized that the EBRC, which has not yet been convened for the next General Election, does not have access to voting information and, therefore, does not base its recommendations on voting patterns.
“The EBRC does not consult the PAP or any other political party. Party politics do not come into this exercise,” Mr Chan said, adding that the committee comprises senior civil servants with no party allegiance, ensuring that its processes are insulated from party politics.
However, when Mr Pritam Singh, Workers’ Party chief and Leader of the Opposition, directly questioned Mr Chan about gerrymandering, Mr Chan did not provide a direct response. Instead, he reiterated his explanation of gerrymandering in other countries and left it to members of the House and the public to draw their own conclusions.
This call from RDU adds to the ongoing discourse around the independence of Singapore’s electoral processes, following motions raised by other opposition parties in recent months.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Community2 weeks ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media2 weeks ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens raise skepticism over Inclusiveness of Singapore’s new Jobseeker Support scheme
Whilst the call by RDU is highly unlikely to be even talked about let alone considered, this call is nevertheless critical.
Any likeminded adult Singaporean qualified to vote should take note of this. The more Singaporeans feels they are hapless, the more they need to believe how they vote will make a difference if they truly clamour for change.
Otherwise, live and let live and forever hold their peace. And going forward, whenever they feel frustrated, point their own fingers at themselves for letting it remain the same, election after election.
Don’t bull-the-shit.
The Singapore Presidency IS NOT INDEPENDENT.
Instead, my suggestion is to have EBRC comes under the Election Department (ED) and reports Directly to Justice Seven which consist of 7 judges elected by :
1. Two judges selected by the Prime Minister;
2. Two judges selected by the 2nd largest political party in the parliament;
3. One judge selected by the Law Society.
This Justice-Seven suppose to protect the constitution in interpreting constitution law and ensure the independence of operations of EBRC and ED.
The best way to move foreward
Obsolete parliament rename it to
National Peoples Congress
mp We call them Tong Zhi
pm We call it 主席
Independant body ?
wasnt it too late ?
Half pass 6 people .
New Thail PM ousted , Japan PM stepped down …( yesterday’s news).
Their laws are more fair than here..?
But we dont know whats cooking in the backrooms..
Politics is a dirty game..
Thank you Red Dot but don’t waste your time on this. Better to educate residents on the box to mark at the elections. Many will have amnesia and tick in favour of the ruling party.
It’s kind of a foolish for Oppo Parties drawn into this redistricting issue – no matter how loud how frequent voices they blow into PAP ears, even getting a rifle to snipe them, it’s futile and unproductive. Get this PAP redistricting FRAUD into your GE aggenda arsenal and aim at them. Oppo Parties can shout till the cows come home. This is NOT a true democracy. Work hard get the PAP out of Parliament. Once in get the PAP on wounded bended knees AND SUE THEM for DISTRESSING Singaporeans, for UPENDING SHEEPS LIVES, FOR fraudulent ownself pay ownself and so… Read more »
Independent, … precisely like accountability, transparency, conflicts of interest and meritocracy, .. holds an entirely different meaning to this regime !!!
So, please, … stop asking, demanding or attempting to protest for all of thee above, when “it” is not allowed to be what it should be !!!
Do NOT spend time on this Electoral Redistricting. Such a small tiny Red dot continuously re partition and repartition every few years – don’t believe in this PAP FRAUD and join in their MEANINGLESS DEBATE. All this PAP Administration if they ARE for Singapore – simply put out population figures that’s all. U mean to say our Population Census Dept, Immigration, HDB all among others DO NOT compile demographic information, statistics – when these ARE ALL CRUCIAL info needed for progress and organisation, relocation, integration plannings for National Development? F this ENTIRE PAP Administration BUNCH of TRAITORS. So day in… Read more »