Comments
Calvin Cheng’s downplaying of gerrymandering in Singapore sparks online backlash
In a Mothership podcast interview, former NMP Calvin Cheng downplayed gerrymandering in Singapore, citing the lack of racial or socioeconomic enclaves. However, his view was challenged by Mothership readers, with some questioning if merging parts of a closely contested constituency into a PAP stronghold GRC could still weaken opposition votes.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2024/08/14104958/Calvin-gerrymandering-1.jpg)
Netizens challenged former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Calvin Cheng’s assertion that “it’s very difficult to gerrymander in Singapore,” arguing that he was downplaying or dismissing the reality of gerrymandering in the country.
While Mr Cheng suggested that Singapore’s ethnic integration policy and the absence of racial or socioeconomic enclaves make gerrymandering difficult, some netizens pressed him to explain whether carving out parts of a closely contested constituency and merging them into a stronghold GRC could still achieve the same effect of weakening opposition votes.
Calvin Cheng Downplays Gerrymandering Concerns in Singapore
In a podcast interview with Mothership published on 10 August on YouTube, Mr Cheng argued that while opposition supporters may suspect gerrymandering, the practicalities of implementing it in Singapore differ significantly from those in countries like the US or the UK.
To explain gerrymandering, he referred to “psephology,” the study of voting trends and patterns, noting that effective gerrymandering requires knowledge of distinct demographic clusters that vote in predictable ways.
He pointed out that in countries like the US, where racial or socioeconomic enclaves exist, gerrymandering is easier because constituency lines can be drawn to favor one party.
However, due to policies such as the Ethnic Integration Policy, Singapore lacks such enclaves.
Citing Minister-in-charge of the Public Service Chan Chun Sing’s claim that the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee (EBRC) does not have access to voting statistics from previous elections, Mr Cheng argued that this makes conventional gerrymandering difficult.
He also challenged the notion that voting behaviour can be predicted based on socioeconomics or demographics in Singapore, given the diversity within each constituency.
“There is no demographic that you are certain; there are no clums of demographics that you can carve out that you know is going to vote in a certain way,” said Mr Cheng.
He emphasized that in Singapore, elections are often decided by swing voters rather than by consistent voting patterns.
Therefore, even if boundaries are redrawn, it does not necessarily guarantee a significant shift in voter support toward one party.
The Mothership podcast host then highlighted concerns raised by NCMP Hazel Poa and Leader of Opposition Pritam Singh in the Parliament on 7 August regarding the neutrality of the EBRC.
Participating in the motion debate, Pritam Singh cited examples where opposition-held constituencies, such as Braddell Heights SMC and Joo Chiat SMC, were absorbed into larger GRCs following close electoral contests.
The debate was initiated by PSP NCMP Hazel Poa, who proposed several reforms to the boundary drawing process.
Mr Cheng reiterated that Singapore’s diverse and integrated population makes it challenging to predict and manipulate voting patterns through boundary changes, meaning even dividing a constituency like Aljunied GRC among other GRCs would not guarantee a benefit for the PAP.
He suggested that attempting to gerrymander in Singapore could backfire, potentially angering voters and leading to unintended consequences, such as losing multiple GRCs rather than securing a single one.
Mr Cheng argued that because concerns are uniform across Singapore, local issues have less impact, which could disadvantage the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) if they focus on local issues to gain votes. Instead, national issues and overall policies become more significant in elections.
Netizens Question if Merging Close-Fight Constituencies into GRCs Could be Considered Gerrymandering
Observing the comments on Mothership’s Facebook post and YouTube, netizens argued that Mr Cheng’s focus on the absence of racial enclaves missed the broader point that gerrymandering can also involve manipulating boundaries based on class and income groups, not just race.
Some netizens accused Cheng of using straw man arguments by focusing narrowly on racial enclaves and ignoring other forms of gerrymandering, such as merging risky SMCs with safer GRCs to protect ruling party interests.
One comment noted that voting behaviour is influenced by factors beyond race, and questioning Mr Cheng whether integrating close-fight constituencies into larger GRCs could still be a form of gerrymandering, even if it’s not straightforward.
The comment suggested that there could be more nuanced methods, such as partially integrating close-fight constituencies into stronghold GRCs, which might still influence election outcomes.
Another netizen criticized Mr. Cheng’s explanations about gerrymandering as unconvincing, arguing that a GRC with a substantial buffer of ruling party votes could safely incorporate an SMC, thus reducing the influence of the opposition’s votes.
Calvin Cheng responds to online criticism
Responding to online criticism, Mr Cheng in a Facebook comment reiterated that errymandering requires an understanding of psephology, which studies long-term voting trends by demographics such as age, race, religion, income, and education, rather than just looking at past election results.
“It’s not about looking at how people voted in the last election (%).”
“And then after studying these psephological underpinnings, you have to map it onto geographical spread to see if gerrymandering can even be done.”
Yeoh Lian Chuan, a Singaporean lawyer, criticized Mr Cheng’s argument as “meaningless semantics.”
He acknowledged that while the term “gerrymandering” might be debated, political manipulation occurs when a constituency is absorbed into a GRC based on political considerations.
“That said, I agree with the Government that constituencies should be designed to be broadly microcosms of Singapore and that the EBRC broadly seeks to do that.”
Mr Yeoh argued that Cheng’s explanation did not address whether political factors influence the delimitation process, which he believes is a significant issue.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Community2 weeks ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media1 week ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens raise skepticism over Inclusiveness of Singapore’s new Jobseeker Support scheme
Thanks, Gutzy.
I’ve just wasted another 5 mins of my life and became stupider after reading about him. Again.
How does people like him get so much media space?
Who are his “followers”, who “tags” him..
To prove there is no gerrymandering the EBRC should be dismantled altogether. Just leave the constituencies as it is for next 3 elections so every one knows the parameters and work the ground.
a dog is always loyal to his master.
how about a well-fed dog?
French of the PxP.
For starters, given SillyPore’s act~tual size, that there exists an EBRC, … is a joke of all jokes is it not !!! On the same theme of size, … you then add to that joke of all jokes again, .. mayors, 2nd, 3rd and Senior Ministers, along with a President and Emeritless Minister and all !!! Then you have jokers , trailing not far behind, .. the likes of Calvin and Ah Sing attempting and strategising to defend the EBRC, … and all of its nonsensical existence, independence and importance !!! Just because it exists, by virtue of a regime… Read more »
He needs to declare if he is being sponsored, paid, compensated by the PAP, PA,RC, CCC, etc.
Is this CC an elite? Eminently qualified to comment on redistricting?
FU CC. Read what the Courts in 🇺🇸 do when Republicans or Democrats redraw voting boundaries.
Obviously he is using his eyes to peek at PAP men and womenfolk faecal holes to see what others miss, and then claim to publicise he can see what others cannot.
Who is he to talk about politics when he’s only a one-time NMP and talked so much controversial issues, including the bus carrying a certain group of children
Wah…PAP’s most loyal IB member.
I wont be too surprised if hes welcomed back to the PAP fold in time for the next GE..
Desperate times call for desperate measures.eg icecream sellers..
Beware😏
Huh? Ethnic or socioeconomic enclaves do not exist? How do you define an “enclave?” If there are two “condominium” projects next to each other, is that not a “socioeconomic enclave?” What about areas with large swaths of bungalows, semi-detached, terrace homes? It seems that this Calvin is making “uninformed and uneducated comments” again. Also, is it not disturbing “racial harmony” by suggesting that different “races” will vote differently? Is every person in a race set to vote for a specific political party or issue by default? There is no individuality between people of a certain “race?” Why would a “racial”… Read more »
In Google chrome browser, Bing, Safari or Edge they rely on extensions to enhance USER browsing experiences on the web, some are useful, improve functionality some are malicious, and they slown, drag, some infect internet speeds.
Calvin Cheng is CERTAINLY a PAP (useless file) extension. What he brings to the general populace of ORIGIN Singaporeans WHO MOST CERTAINLY DO NOT NEED any form of PAP malicious living extensions of experiences which parallelly SLOW DOWN, CRIMP the speed of progress of lives of us, AND our Children and Children’s Children.
can we fit a square peg in a round hole? lol
It’s wise, NOT to ARGUE/DEBATE with Fools – dont even response.
A trash trying so very hard to turn itself into gold. Yet no one even give a glimpse or has a fleeting thought
It’s becoming TOXIC and OBNOXIOUS.
Like the PAP Administration, CC and it wanted to SALVAGE a lost cause. Some sheeps my board their gravy train.
Let’s see.