Connect with us

Community

Criticism mounts over video of HDB bomb shelter converted into maid’s quarters

A video showing a HDB bomb shelter repurposed as a maid’s room has ignited an online debate. Critics argue that the arrangement is inhumane and legally dubious, claiming that providing a windowless room undermines the maid’s well-being.

Published

on

Video of Bomb Shelter as Maid’s Room Sparks Debate

SINGAPORE: A video showcasing a bomb shelter converted into a maid’s living space has sparked a heated online debate.

Originally posted on TikTok by a local retailer, the footage features a bunk bed with the maid’s sleeping area on the upper level, alongside a small shelf, a ventilation gap, and a louvred sliding door.

Ventilation holes above the bed are also visible.

@anniewang91

Helper room loft bed with shelf customize.singapore/sliding door customize

♬ 原声 – NING WANG – NING WANG

The video, which had its comments disabled, was later re-uploaded to Reddit on 24 July, under the caption, “HDB bomb shelter with loft bed for helper liveable?”

In response to queries from Shin Min Daily News, the bunk bed retailer disclosed that the custom furniture, which includes the bunk bed, bookshelf, and sliding door, cost approximately S$2,900 (US$2,161).

The retailer noted that many homeowners have requested similar conversions, though ventilation remains a significant challenge.

The current homeowner opted for a customized solution to enhance air circulation.

The retailer endorsed the homeowner’s decision, suggesting that it reflects a commitment to improving living conditions for domestic workers.

Local real estate experts have weighed in on the controversy, highlighting the regulatory aspects of bomb shelter usage.

Real estate agent Jack Sheo (萧文俞), interviewed by Zaobao, explained that while it is common for homeowners to use bomb shelters as maid’s rooms, understanding the legal implications is crucial.

“Homeowners cannot rent out bomb shelters as separate rooms,” he explained.

“Moreover, if the original bomb-proof door is removed, it must be reinstalled before the property is sold, as it is specifically designed and must be retained.”

Richard, another seasoned real estate agent, concurred that using bomb shelters for maids can be a more humane solution compared to other arrangements within the flat.

However, he emphasized the importance of adhering to regulations.

“Although it’s not illegal, the Singapore Civil Defence Force may recommend reinstating the original door during inspections,” he added.

Online dispute over converting bomb shelters into maid’s rooms

The use of bomb shelters as maid’s quarters has led to widespread condemnation from netizens on Reddit and The New Paper’s Facebook page.

One user suggested that the homeowner should live in the converted bomb shelter for three months to assess its suitability for a maid.

Another user questioned the legality of such arrangements, arguing that providing a windowless room is inhumane and detrimental to the maid’s well-being.

“How can they perform well if you don’t treat them properly?” the user asked.

Several comments expressed strong opposition to using bomb shelters as living spaces.

A netizen wrote, “No one should be made to stay in a bomb shelter. It seems common because homeowners want helpers but don’t want to sacrifice their own living space.”

They emphasized that domestic helpers are human beings, not slaves, and deserve a proper place to sleep, noting that lack of ventilation is harmful to health.

Some defend using bomb shelters as maid’s rooms due to limited space in HDB flats

However, not all responses were critical. Some users defended the practice under certain circumstances.

One comment noted that while the arrangement might not be ideal, it provides the maid with her own space rather than having to share rooms with children or elderly family members.

The comment suggested that given the constraints of HDB flats, such a solution might be the best option when space is limited.

Another comment highlighted the high cost of HDB BTO flats, suggesting that many homeowners cannot afford larger apartments with extra bedrooms to accommodate a maid.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
17 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Why change if not broken?
But most will perceive as improvements and not patching a flaw.

1) As the name suggests, the bomb shelter is for Singaporeans to shelter in the event of war. 2) However we need to question whether, in modern warfare, the bomb shelter is sufficiently adequate. I guess many would say “better than nothing” 3) I estimate 99.9% of residents with a bomb shelter use the bomb shelter as a store room. In which case, during war, I doubt if the bomb shelter is “ready” for use. Thus, nullifying its prime purpose. 4) So, if the bomb shelter is to house residents in time of war, I suppose during normal times, it… Read more »

A simple fix would be that MOM mandates where the worker is staying, there should be a window (of some sort) and good ventilation. But MOM is likely too stupid (or likely simply bo-chap) to understand this.

The Cheapo Singaporeans again. Because our leaders are cheapos (but yet can afford to stay in colonial bungalows, hor). Our FDW situation is long-overdue for a rethink. Why need to stay-in at the employer’s place? Why not gov give up the maid levy fee and make it mandatory for them to stay at purpose-built dorms with proper facilities in each district? That would be easily to monitor and regulate their welfare, any abuses, proper number of hours of work entitled, etc… right? Oh, but our leaders are cheapos when it doesn’t concerns themselves. The cheapo way to boost the GDP.… Read more »

I am not sure what are the regulations regarding the bomb shelter. Surely the bomb shelter is for emergency use. As such, it should only have ‘easy to remove’ items so that it can be cleared and used in a short time in an emergency. Removing the door should be a strictly ‘no-no’ because it is not easily refitted. HDB has regulations in place but what is usually missing (as in most ministries) is enforcement of these regulations (ie. lack of ‘policing’).

The classic view will be, … better than nothing leh !!!

Better for who, and whose the judge !!!

After a hard day’s toil, … one must real~ly real~ly look forward to returning to a tiny tiny windowless room !!!

Without fresh air, it’s unlikely there’ll be a fresh mind and fresh body, … to tackle the challenges of the following day !!!

MOM is at fault. Why approve work permits without checking if the maid has her own room.. This should be made mandatory.

Quite well done though space abit tight. But well thought out and not cheap to customise too.
With proper door for ventilation and a 12 inch wall fan, for such Third World worker considered as very good already!😆😆

In mny places around the world, maids or domestic carers need not be hired live-in. They are employed as in 9 to 5 or 8 to 6 like normal work employment. In fact, this might be a better option bcz then reduces the maids chances of over work abuse for eg.

The maid is considered fortunate. With employment, money for her family back home.

CONTRAST how the PAP CRUELLY ILL TREAT it’s own Senior Citizens whose previous toils assisted, to build SG – BUNCH THEM UP in small flats with TOTAL STRANGERS. And these flats ARE NOT FREE. How much is the RENT PAP collects.

And WHO paid for the Previous Construction of these FLATS – PAP Administration Ministers Pockets?

And without these senior citizens, WOULD PAP gets to enjoy life, enjoy Bungalow living?

A MINISCOPE of how the PAP Administration control the functions of accomodation in SG, right? NOT? 100S of 1000s of Foreign Trash is fine to them for them.

1. Monsters live in HUGE PALATIAL Bungalows in Ridout Rd with no debate, no arguments, from colleagues, whimpers there is from Pariahment making token voices, to stage authencity of checks and balances.

2. Monsters said Land must set aside for umborns. What’s the target? What X numbers of unborn babies by what X year?

3. Forests DO NOT have value.

Fantastic PAP Administration strategy to PLUCK Sheegaporeans LEFT RIGHT CENTRE UPSIDE DOWN.

I do not understand the reasoning behind some of the comments. Flats are expensive, so the solution is to hire a domestic worker, which is also an additional cost.

So what is the argument here? If someone can afford an “expensive” BTO flat and hire a domestic worker, I do not think money is the issue here.

This is a product or maids living condition

The Product is too expensive

Maid living condition like Shitgaporean

No need to give example

Trending