Human rights
US government faces lawsuit over immigration app
Immigration advocates filed a lawsuit against the US government, arguing that the CBP One app for asylum requests violates migrants’ human rights by limiting access to the asylum process, especially for marginalized refugees.
The app’s requirements, including smartphone usage and facial recognition technology, make it difficult for many migrants to seek asylum in the United States.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2023/07/17063249/pexels-tim-mossholder-1709929-3-1-1-1.png)
LOS ANGELES, UNITED STATES — Immigration advocates sued the US government on Thursday, arguing that conditioning asylum requests on the use of an app violate migrants’ human rights, according to the legal action filed in federal court.
The suit, the latest legal challenge to the Biden administration’s immigration agenda, takes aim at the CBP (Customs and Border Protection) One app, which it says makes it impossible for many to seek asylum in the United States.
“CBP One essentially creates an electronic waitlist that restricts access to the U.S. asylum process to a limited number of privileged migrants,” notes the legal brief.
It was filed in federal court in California on Thursday by the immigration organizations Al Otro Lado and the Haitian Bridge Alliance, along with 10 migrants who claim the application blocked their attempt to seek asylum.
US President Joe Biden’s administration launched CBP One in January as it wound down immigration rules enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Migrants must use CBP One to schedule an appointment at a port of entry into the United States.
But accessing the app requires a smartphone, internet access and electricity — all hard to access for migrants on long and dangerous journeys fleeing their home countries.
Between January and June an estimated 170,000 people scheduled appointments through the app, authorities have said.
However, migrants and activists have both criticized the app.
Along with the difficulties in accessing it, the organizations behind the lawsuit also said in a statement that the app’s discriminatory facial recognition technology has prevented many Black and darker-skinned immigrants from obtaining an appointment.
The legal document states that by forcing migrants who have not made an appointment through the app to turn back at the border, the US government is putting them in greater danger.
“The Biden administration’s new turnback policy is just the latest manifestation of the U.S. government’s multi-year effort to block access to asylum at the southern border,” said Melissa Crow, litigation director for the Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, which is representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
“By gatekeeping asylum behind an inaccessible smartphone app, the turnback policy violates our laws, makes a mockery of our asylum system, and leaves the most marginalized refugees behind,” she added.
The lawsuit is the latest legal challenge to Biden’s immigration policies, which have focused on developing legal migration programs and alternatives in an attempt to lower illegal crossings.
Last month the US Supreme Court upheld the federal government’s right to decide which undocumented migrants should be targeted for deportation, after the states of Texas and Louisiana challenged that policy.
— AFP
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Politics2 weeks ago
SM Lee: Singaporeans must ‘change attitudes’ as Govt promises ‘bold and necessary changes’
-
Community1 week ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media7 days ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore1 week ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore1 week ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation