Connect with us

Singapore

Singapore introduces financial aid scheme for unemployed workers engaging in skills training and career coaching

Singapore’s Prime Minister Lawrence Wong introduced the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme, offering up to S$6,000 over six months to unemployed lower- and middle-income workers. Recipients must participate in training, career coaching, and job-matching services, with further details to be provided by Manpower Minister Tan See Leng.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Prime Minister Lawrence Wong has introduced the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme, nearly a year after first suggesting the need to assist those who face involuntary unemployment.

In his inaugural National Day Rally Speech on Sunday (18 Aug), Mr Wong detailed the initiative, which aims to support lower- and middle-income workers who have lost their jobs by offering financial aid, contingent on their participation in training, career coaching, and job-matching services.

The scheme, developed in partnership with the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the labour movement, will offer eligible workers financial assistance of up to S$6,000 over a six-month period. However, Mr Wong emphasized that recipients must actively participate in training, career coaching, and job-matching services to qualify for the support.

“These are essential investments that you need to make in yourself to find better jobs,” Mr Wong said. “This is the essence of our renewed social compact. We will have your back, we will stand by you; but you too must take responsibility for your actions, and make an effort to pull yourself up.”

Manpower Minister Tan See Leng is expected to provide further details about the new scheme in the coming weeks.

Mr Wong first raised the idea of unemployment support in September last year, and expanded on his considerations during his Budget speech in February. On Sunday, he elaborated on the government’s cautious approach to such schemes, noting that while some countries offer unemployment insurance, the experience has not always been positive.

“After getting a generous benefit, the person might find it more attractive to stay unemployed than go back to work,” he explained. “That’s why the government has always been wary about such schemes.”

Nevertheless, Mr Wong acknowledged the significant impact of job loss on workers and their families, stating, “We have to do something – to lessen the strain on those who are affected.”

The new scheme comes in the wake of a series of high-profile layoffs in Singapore, with the number of retrenchments in 2023 more than doubling from the previous year. Companies such as Lazada, Amazon, Shopback, Ninja Van, and Citi have all announced layoffs recently, heightening concerns about job security.

In addition to the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support Scheme, Mr Wong also discussed the SkillsFuture Level-Up programme, which was first announced during his Budget speech in February. The programme provides all Singaporeans aged 40 and above with a S$4,000 SkillsFuture credit top-up and includes a training allowance of up to S$3,000 per month for those who take time off work to study full-time.

Recognizing the challenges faced by those pursuing part-time courses, Mr Wong announced that some of the training allowance would be extended to individuals attending part-time courses as well. The Ministry of Education is currently working on the details and will provide more information when ready.

While the scheme appears to offer much-needed support to those affected by job loss, there are concerns about its broader implications. Critics might argue that the scheme, while providing temporary relief, does little to address the underlying economic issues that contribute to unemployment. Moreover, the requirement for recipients to undergo training, which excludes them from unemployment figures, may create a more favorable image of the labour market than the reality suggests.

By not counting those in training as unemployed, the government could potentially mask the true extent of joblessness, leading to skepticism about the transparency and effectiveness of the statistics being reported. As such, the scheme’s impact on both individuals and the broader economy remains to be seen.

Unemployment insurance will reduce workers’ motivation to find new jobs

In a related note, former Minister for Manpower Josephine Teo had previously expressed serious concerns about the concept of unemployment insurance during a Parliament session in 2020. Mrs Teo argued that such a plan could reduce workers’ motivation to find new employment and decrease employers’ willingness to offer retrenchment benefits.

The idea of unemployment insurance has been advocated by the Workers’ Party since 2016, with MP Sylvia Lim suggesting that a fund financed by small contributions from both workers and employers could better protect workers. However, Mrs Teo contended that Singapore’s existing approach, which focuses on employment support through programmes like SkillsFuture and Adapt and Grow, has proven to be more sustainable and effective.

“Our current approach of focusing on employment support has shown encouraging results and is more sustainable,” Mrs Teo said at the time. “As long as jobs are still being created, a focus on employment support helps both the individuals and businesses.”

Mrs Teo also highlighted the government’s efforts to assist mid-career workers who lose their jobs, including helping businesses sustain job creation, maintaining workers’ motivation to upskill, and promoting fair employment practices among employers.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
19 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Actually Wong is indirectly admitting many of the locals are unemployed or have difficulty securing a decent job but refuse to state this as so. This $6000 is a temporary sweetener till election is over.
On the other hand, his cunning and shrewd Manpower minister Tan SL refused to reveal exact proportion of locals having full time employment and lump PR together with citizens.
The suituation must be bad.
How bad? Well, you locals did asked for this ,right?
You VOTED FOR IT!😆😆😆😆😆

Se months ago, at PRis Train Stn met a person promotion skills future courses. I asked about the nature of courses being ‘on sale’.

What about hacking, networking, python, rust programing, coding imstead of what’s the usual run of the mill, on offer like, How to use U tube, How to use I pad, how to avoid scams.

Guess what. That guy replied, NO FUNDING.

聽說,我附近 有 中老年女士同袍 在跳 迷你 曠場舞

奇怪 這時間不必做工 ?

中華文化 太棒了

One new scheme on top of another..
No one seens to be using their brain…even after rewarding themselves with mil$alaries.
SGs got skills but no future .

Come on, it’s offering up to S$6,000 over six months. So it is $6000 or less but assuming it is $6000, that’s only $1000 a month. In the today’s cost of living, $1000 is nothing. And the skillsfuture programmes had proven to be having no future ever since the whole failure started with WDA, a long forgotten “lackgacy”. Why are we still doing the same thing proven not to work? From these, it can be seen that lawran wrong is not the person that is any better than his predecessor and he has the nerve to ask for our support?

If a policy has failed over many years already, repackaging it with a few bells and whistles will also NOT work. It only shows our million$ monkeys haven’t got the grasp of the root causes. Just repeating failed policies only confirms that lawlanWong is bankrupt of NEW IDEAS on how to address the main issues in SG. Notice again, they think to throw more money will solve persisting issues.

So our million$ Monkeys have SkillsFutured themselves to be Donkeys – congratulations indeed on performance.

$6000? Problem solved?

Which means after an unemployed Singaporean attends SkillsFuture courses, potential employers will be eager to take that Singaporean in with open arms, ready to cancel their plans to re-hire or extend the contracts of their foreign employees?

I hope so.

Otherwise, it’ll just be a temporary fix, and not a lasting solution to persistent unemployment, especially for those above their 40s who are retrenched.

Was LW using a teleprompter?
Wah , he spoke so energetically for 1.5hrs w/o a break…
….still cant beat LHL…one NDR he spoke for 3hrs ..in 3 languages…till he pengsan…you all remember that???

All these give aways …treating sgs like beggars…
More aliens will opt for SGcitizenship and that red passport to all these perks !

Still didnt say specifically how to beat the present high cost of living etc….basically the bread n butter issues…⁰

Upskilling, re-training and now career coaching FOR STINKIE….err….I mean Sinkie… CECA laughing like mad, watching this from his rented $8500 per mth condo 65 inch LED TV over looking the condo swimming pool!😆😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆😆

We need anti trust laws to prevent companies from working together to control prices unfairly or to create a monopoly. We need to break up monopoly, oligopoly and those who control price to create a competitive market to reduce prices. Stop making rich become richer. The new way forward.

We need anti trust laws to prevent companies from working together to control prices unfairly or to create a monopoly. Singapore PAP through Temasek,GIC and many companies control many Singapore big companies like NTUC to suck people money and now prices of many products are high. We need to break them all up. Many people go to Malaysia, Johor Bahru to buy grocery see the truth about Singapore prices. Singapore companies are making money and profit but they raise prices on consumers. To reduce prices and create a competitive market, we need anti trust laws to make prices competitive. Break… Read more »

So … basically $1000 a month for six months “support”. Is the $1000 still sufficient to buy/(continue paying mortgage) on your own HDB pigeon hole now? Skills training is fine PROVIDED it is for doing a job you are INTERESTED in. Not everyone is interested in being a security guard or janitor leh.

LPPL. If there’s a statutory law SG First, why need all these useless schemes to plaster over knife cuts injuries, physical body slam injuries, traumas, PAP induced ones, esp – when jobs for Foreign Trash are served to them on a HUGE GIGANTIC PAP Platter. All these schemes OPENED UP the EVUDENCES of PAP FAILURES. Why SG LOST jobs to Foreign Trash and PAP Administration DO NOT ACCORD protection to Citizens, INSTEAD PAP scold citizens. Then Whose fault?? How . MUCH CITIZENS PAYING to Administer all THESE schemes – $25,000,000 Dollars Rob from Reserves ANNUALLY when IT is A MASSIVE… Read more »

All I care is how to end the IB jobs. They are dishonest, bigoted and biased. Not considered good people.

Replace by Foreign Talents

And yet must accept all this 不平等条約

Or those company should retrench more Shitgaporean , they are being guarantee .

Only for Singaporeans or the entire 6million?

Trending