Connect with us

Community

Singapore govt proposes powers for new unit to resolve severe neighbourly disputes

The Singapore government is seeking to empower a new Community Relations Unit (CRU) to investigate and intervene in severe neighbor disputes, including noise disturbances, through mediation, noise sensors, and legal actions as part of proposed amendments to the Community Disputes Resolution Act.

Published

on

Singapore Govt Proposes New Unit to Resolve Severe Neighbourly Disputes

SINGAPORE: The government is set to grant a newly established unit, the Community Relations Unit (CRU), the authority to investigate and intervene in cases of noise disturbances between neighbours as part of proposed amendments to the Community Disputes Resolution Act.

The new laws, expected to be introduced in Parliament later in 2024, aim to address severe neighborly disputes more effectively.

On 12 August, authorities outlined the specific powers that the CRU will possess under the Community Disputes Resolution (Amendment) Bill.

These powers include the ability to issue warnings or abatement orders, require neighbours to undergo mediation, and install noise sensors in homes to monitor noise levels.

However, these sensors can only be installed with the consent of the residents in the affected units.

The Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth, the Ministry of Law, and the Ministry of National Development (MND) issued a joint statement clarifying that the CRU will only intervene after residents have unsuccessfully attempted to resolve their disputes on their own.

The ministries also highlighted the benefits of noise sensors, which can be installed in common areas such as corridors.

Unlike sound recordings that can be distorted during playback, these sensors provide reliable data on the direction, timing, and intensity of noise, thereby helping to prove or dismiss complaints.

However, the installation of these sensors will remain optional, and they will not be deployed without the complainants’ consent.

To protect privacy, the data collected by the sensors will be transmitted in real-time to secure Singapore-based servers, with strict access controls ensuring that raw recordings are not stored.

In addition to introducing the CRU, the proposed amendments will bring two significant changes to the Community Dispute Management Framework.

The first change aims to promote the early resolution of disputes through community mediation.

The second change will enhance the powers of the Community Disputes Resolution Tribunals (CDRT) to address cases more swiftly and effectively.

The CDRT, which serves as a last resort for severe disputes that cannot be resolved through mediation or the CRU, will be empowered to issue interim orders for immediate relief and mandatory treatment orders for individuals whose disturbances are linked to mental health conditions.

Emphasizing the objective of the Bill, the ministries stated, “These enhancements will strengthen, not replace, the community’s ability to come together early and resolve their differences as good neighbors.”

New unit to tackle noise and hoarding disputes in Tampines pilot

The Community Relations Unit (CRU), announced in 2023, will be piloted for a year starting in Tampines, a town with an average caseload, to ensure representative findings.

After the pilot, authorities will decide on expanding the CRU island-wide.

Staffed by officers with law enforcement and mediation experience, the CRU will be supported by auxiliary police. Both must identify themselves while on duty, with identities verifiable through an MND webpage.

These officers can take statements from involved parties and enter residences to gather evidence with the owner’s consent or approval from the director-general of community relations.

CRU officers can require mediation and issue advisories, warnings, or abatement orders to stop noise disturbances. Non-compliance with mediation directions could result in a fine of up to $1,500 (US1,1,32).

Violating abatement orders could lead to fines of up to $10,000 (US$7,548) for a first offense and up to $20,000 (US$15,096), three months’ imprisonment, or both for repeat offenses.

Officers may also require the removal of objects causing a nuisance, with authorization.

The Housing Board may consider compulsory acquisition of flats as a last resort for severe, persistent nuisances, similar to measures for cases of killer litter under the Penal Code.

The Bill also allows the CRU to address severe in-unit hoarding by applying for a Community Disputes Resolution Tribunal (CDRT) order to declutter a unit if it has caused “unreasonable interference” to neighbors and the hoarder has not complied with a previous order.

Public supports mediation and targeted government intervention in severe neighbor disputes

In a 2023 public consultation, over 300 responses showed strong support for government intervention in severe neighbour disputes, particularly those involving noise.

Respondents emphasized that these powers should be used appropriately.

Mediation remains a priority, with 80% of cases at the Community Mediation Centre successfully resolved.

However, less than 30% of cases proceed to mediation due to unwillingness from one party.

The Bill empowers agencies like the CRU to direct parties to mediation and allows settlements to be registered as CDRT orders, ensuring quicker legal recourse if breached.

Neighbors should attempt mediation before filing a CDRT claim, as court outcomes often lead to a winner and loser, which may not be ideal for ongoing neighborly relations.

Public consultations acknowledged that while CDRT proceedings could strain relationships, they may be necessary for serious cases.

Enhancements include encouraging landlords to act when tenants cause nuisances and allowing the CDRT to award costs for pursuing claims, with additional costs potentially imposed on those refusing mediation.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
15 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

S1

Last edited 3 months ago by Blankslate

Why bother to set up another bo liao committe calling themselves by some stupid names?
The squabbling neighbors shall each be given a BUNGALOW to stay, LIKE THOSE BLACK AND WHITE ONES at Ridout Road or other similiar locations and they can also pay below market rent for these premises, to help them resolve their differences.
Sure to work one!
Afterall with the vast spacious land space between them, want to quarrel also cannot loh!😆😆😆🤣🤣🤣😆😆😆

More arbitrary powers to police and persecute…😠

s2

Last edited 3 months ago by Blankslate

We have had Public Housing since 1932 and have never needed another agency to mediate or the involvement of the axillary police force. Is this to protect new citizens? My aunt who lived in Tanglin Halt complained to HDB when a foreign Chinese family bought the flat next door and had six family members in a three room flat. The children used the common corridor as a place to play. The family ‘s entire foot wear was placed opposite my aunt’s flat. The children screamed and ran up and down the corridor. An HDB officer who visited the flat told… Read more »

HDB should seriously amend their building technics and hardware..
Make it soundproof …at least for each units ceiling..
This noise problems are not new..its been present all the while…but previously our hdb flats were real solid ie walls etc.
But lately the quality of HDB flats’ building materials are very poor, hence noises more audible..
My observation…as ive lived in the old and the new models..
…Can tell the difference.
Costs of hdb flats are getting more & more expensive..but quality is getting worse and worse..!!

HDB is the landlord for 70-80% of “home owners” in this country. The HDB leaseholder agreement if anyone has bothered to read it comes with a laundry list of do’s and don’ts.

Why not just give HDB the power to resolve the disputes like a normal landlord should? Why does the ruling government need to constantly create all of these useless government agencies to “resolve” issues?

Please use the classic Military guy who bangs the wall non stop when he comes home.

It must be very frustrating and stressful for his neighbours in his block. Perhaps other netizens can provide better info about this guy to the newly established Community Relations Unit (CRU) so that peace can prevail there

How big is this Community Relations Unit going to be?

With the kind of function like planting sound sensors, collecting the data, analysing them, convincing complainant to participate and follow-up mediation…..etc.

And the desire of the government for the local population to grow by millions in the next decade in this small island with limited space, will increase the density and close proximity in housing.

How many cases of neighbours dispute are we talking about each year now?
And how many dispute do you project a year with the above population growth?

Is it really a feasible proposal?

Headache, right?

Another useless initiative giving impression of stellar pro active actions when all needed to be done is revamp some sections or redesign certain functions with perhaps slight tweak of laws or provisions.

The increase in neighbour disputes has direct correlation with increased population density. Few decades ago, when I studied geography in secondary school mentioning Singapore’s population desity, it was 3,800+ per sqkm. As of 2021, the 2nd year of covid-19, the Singapore’s population density was more than 8,300+ per sqkm. The HDB internal size had since reduced somewhere between 5% to 15% and price per sqm increased more than 6x with income increased less than 3x. Yet, sound-proofing of HDB builds are getting worse and worse, trying to keep the building cost down to maintain developer’s profits. Space getting tighter and… Read more »

Trending