Business
Allianz’s double-digit ROI expectations re-affirms concerns over its commitment to Income’s social mission
The debate over Allianz’s acquisition of a majority stake in Income Insurance has entered a new phase, with concerns heightened after CEO Oliver Baete’s statement about expecting a “double-digit ROI.” This focus on profit arguably may overshadow Allianz’s commitment to Income’s social mission.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2024/08/09114458/double-return.png)
The ongoing debate surrounding the acquisition of a majority stake in Singapore’s Income Insurance by German insurance giant Allianz has entered a new phase, with concerns being heightened following statements made by Allianz CEO Oliver Baete on 8 August.
During the company’s second-quarter earnings briefing in Frankfurt, Baete revealed that Allianz expects a “double-digit return on investment (ROI) over time” from the acquisition, a remark that has deepened concerns over whether Allianz will prioritize profit over Income’s long-standing social mission.
The acquisition, announced on 17 July, has been a subject of intense public and parliamentary debate. Many have questioned whether Allianz will remain committed to providing affordable insurance for Singapore’s lower-wage workers—a mission that has defined Income Insurance for decades. Baete’s recent statements have only served to fuel these concerns.
Baete spoke on the acquisition, stating, “The deal creates a very strong home base for us in Singapore. We have been domiciled here since 1991 but never had an operating business in the city-state. Now, we do have it, and it is with a leading franchise. We are proud of having the trust of the community to do so.”
He added, “We expect a double-digit return on investment over time, but more importantly, this acquisition propels Allianz from zero to a leadership position in Singapore.”
However, Baete’s emphasis on financial returns has raised questions about how Allianz plans to reconcile its profit-driven objectives with its commitment to Income’s social mission.
In a Parliamentary session on 6 August, Second Minister for Finance and Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) board member Mr Chee Hong Tat sought to reassure the public, stating that MAS would carefully assess Allianz’s track record and commitment to Income’s social mission before approving the acquisition.
“MAS will ensure that Allianz has the financial capacity to support Income and the willingness to keep insurance operations well-run,” Mr Chee said. “There will be no change to the terms and conditions of existing insurance contracts should the deal be approved.”
Adding to the debate, Workers’ Party chief and Leader of the Opposition Mr Pritam Singh expressed doubts about NTUC Enterprise’s ability to maintain affordable premiums once Allianz assumes majority control.
He remarked, “With Allianz holding the majority stake, the concern is whether the social mission of Income will take a back seat to profit-making.”
In response to these concerns, Mr Chee highlighted that Singapore’s competitive insurance market could play a role in ensuring affordable premiums remain available.
“Other insurers in Singapore are also providing affordable premiums, and the competitive market should help ensure that these needs are met, including for lower-income segments,” he stated.
Baete, during the earnings briefing, acknowledged the “local noise” surrounding Income’s purpose following its corporatisation 2½ years ago.
He attempted to assure stakeholders by saying, “We are fully committed to the cause of Income in supplying affordable access to insurance and healthcare cover because that is what’s really needed. This is a partnership, not a sell-out. NTUC Enterprise will remain involved, ensuring that the franchise and customer access are available to serve us.”
Despite Baete’s assurances, many remain skeptical about how Allianz’s profit-driven objectives can coexist with Income’s social mission.
Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) Mr Leong Mun Wai from the Progress Singapore Party voiced concerns that focusing solely on Income’s financial viability might overshadow its social mission.
“The social mission of Income, though it may seem less prominent now due to market conditions, still provides Singaporeans with a sense of security. The question is whether this mission will be sacrificed in the name of profit,” he remarked.
Minister of State for Culture, Community, and Youth Mr Alvin Tan reiterated NTUC’s commitment to its social mission but emphasized the importance of financial sustainability.
“Social enterprises must be competitive and financially sustainable. If a social enterprise cannot sustain itself financially, it may not fulfill its purpose,” he said.
Tan also acknowledged that NTUC Enterprise cannot continue providing capital injections indefinitely, which was a key factor in Income’s decision to corporatise in 2022.
“This is why Income sought to corporatise in 2022, to access more capital and remain viable in a competitive market,” he explained.
Mr Tan further reassured that Allianz had provided written commitments to uphold Income’s existing policies, including a pledge of S$100 million over ten years to support its social mission.
“This sale is aimed at ensuring long-term protection for Singaporeans while addressing both immediate and future challenges,” he noted.
However, as the public and policymakers await MAS’s final decision, concerns persist over whether Allianz will genuinely honour its commitment to Income’s social mission or whether profit will ultimately take precedence.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Community2 weeks ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media1 week ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics2 weeks ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion2 weeks ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore2 weeks ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation
-
Comments2 weeks ago
Netizens raise skepticism over Inclusiveness of Singapore’s new Jobseeker Support scheme
If you are not a complete idiot or “carrot head”, the very SIMPLE question to ask is: What is a private company like Allianz motive be to buy over Income? To make profits or for corporate philanthropy? If for profits, HOW are profits generated?
If the 4G cannot even see their way through this, the fewture of Singapore being led by them is: liaw liaw lah. Ie: gone case.
My last paycheck was $9500 by working a few hours a week online. My sister’s friend has been averaging 15k now and she works about a few hours a week. I can’t believe how easy it is when did I try it out? This is what I do.
See—->>> Www.Cashprofit7.Com
It’s $10million a year. What is the big deal? Is this fulfilling Income ‘s social role? This deal should not happen as Mr. Ong had an “existing,” Conflict of Interest when Income was made a Corporate. Another reason is if shares were given to NTUC Enterprises at a discounted rate on the condition that they cannot sell their stake in Income.
Making extra salary every month from house more than $15,000 just by doing simple copy and paste like online job. I have received $18,000 from this easy home job. Everybody can now makes extra cash online easily.
By Just Follow…………………. Www.NetPay1.Com
The community didn’t trust you Allianz. You are mistaken. Only the PSP and ruling elites trust you.
No idea what pAp is trying to do? True blue locals are already losing out in the IT and finance industry which lead to us losing out on Fintech after they signed CECA. Then they failed to stop the selling of our private medical services eg. Parkway Holdings. Now they failed to stop the selling of the very company that true blue locals rely on for our health insurances …….. can someone explain what are they up to?
Both ceo baete and pap share the same vision- double digit monetary growth for self interest, sell out the people of singapore, throw the people of singapore under the bus. Like the now dead lee kuan yew used to say: “we (pap) do what we think is right. Never mind what the people think!” Use your votes wisely, vote against pap to reverse this atrocious act of pap selling out the singapore people again and again. Every vote counts, pap has already won the next and subsequent elections. We vote against pap to deny them the two thirds majority. Then… Read more »
Amidst all the smoke, it must be emphasized both Chee Hong Tat and Alvin Tan reiterated that Allianz is required to assure that EXISTING policies are not affected.
One can almost feel the glee of CEO Oliver Baete in snagging the deal.
He said “We expect a double-digit return on investment over time, but more importantly, this acquisition propels Allianz from zero to a leadership position in Singapore.”
So, where will this double digit ROI come from?
Which insurance company should we go to if we cannot continue with Allianz?