Connect with us

Singapore

Edwin Tong affirms due process in NTUC Income corporatisation amidst concerns over its sale

Minister Edwin Tong addressed public concerns over NTUC Income’s corporatisation in 2022 amidst the ongoing debate over the sale of a majority stake in the insurance company to Allianz, affirming that due process was followed, as verified by the Registry of Co-operative Societies.

Published

on

Minister for Culture, Community and Youth Edwin Tong addressed recent concerns regarding the corporatisation of NTUC Income in 2022 amidst the ongoing debate over the sale of a majority stake in the insurance company to German MNC Allianz Europe B.V.

In a Facebook post on Sunday, Mr Tong emphasized that the Registry of Co-operative Societies (RCS) under the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth (MCCY) is satisfied that due process was followed during the corporatisation exercise.

Mr Tong’s statement came as a response to the criticisms raised by former NTUC Income CEO, Mr Tan Suee Chieh, who had expressed concerns about the corporatisation process and subsequent sale to Allianz.

In his open letter to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), Mr Tan highlighted issues such as the dilution of minority shareholders’ stakes and the commitment by NTUC Enterprise to maintain a majority shareholding post-corporatisation.

In his Facebook post, Mr Tong reiterated the importance of financial sustainability for co-operatives to effectively serve their social missions.

He noted that the MCCY oversees the governance and functions of co-operatives, which play a crucial role in building a caring and inclusive community in Singapore.

“Questions have recently surfaced about the corporatisation of Income in 2022. This matter was raised previously to the Registry of Co-operative Societies (RCS) under MCCY. The RCS had then advised all parties that this was a matter for NTUC Income and its members to collectively determine and resolve. What was important was the need to be transparent about the arrangements and to allow Income’s members to decide whether or not to proceed with corporatisation,” Mr Tong stated.

He emphasized that NTUC Income had conducted consultations with its members, provided necessary disclosures, and given ample opportunities for members to seek clarification on the corporatisation plans. Ultimately, members voted overwhelmingly in favour of corporatisation.

“From a regulatory perspective, therefore, RCS is satisfied that due process was followed in that corporatisation exercise,” Mr Tong concluded.

Missing Commitment on Majority Shares

Mr Tong’s statement, while affirming the regulatory approval of the corporatisation process, did not address the specific commitment made by NTUC Enterprise to hold a majority shareholding post-corporatisation.

In the NTUC Income’s 2022 AGM, it was said:

“Addressing the first concern, the CEO [Andrew Yeo] said that Income will remain a social enterprise within NTUC Enterprise’s network of organisations, even after it becomes a corporate entity. Post-corporatisation, NTUC Enterprise will continue to be the majority shareholder of the new company, Income Insurance Limited.”

This commitment was a crucial assurance provided to NTUC Income’s members and stakeholders to safeguard the cooperative’s social mission.

The promise that NTUC Enterprise would retain a majority shareholding was highlighted by Mr Tan in his objections to the sale of the majority stake to Allianz. He argued that the sale contradicted this assurance, raising concerns about the future prioritization of NTUC Income’s social mission over commercial interests.

Germany’s Allianz announced on 17 July that it planned to buy a majority stake in Income Insurance for about US$1.6 billion. Allianz offered S$40.58 per share, valuing the transaction at S$2.2 billion (US$1.66 billion) for a 51% stake in Income Insurance.

NTUC Enterprise currently holds a 72.8% stake in Income and will remain a substantial shareholder if the sale proceeds.

The joint statement from NTUC Enterprise and Income Insurance aimed to rebut Mr Tan’s claims by emphasizing the necessity of capital injections at par value and asserting their continued commitment to NTUC Income’s social mission. However, the statement did not fully address Mr Tan’s core concern of the dilution of minority shareholders’ stakes and the assurance of maintaining majority ownership.

Mr Tong noted that several parliamentary questions have been raised regarding the proposed deal between Income and Allianz. He assured that these questions would be addressed when Parliament meets later this week, providing an opportunity for further clarification and discussion on the matter.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
23 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
23 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This underscore the true peril we face in not understanding how profoundly lacking people are respecting the power of language. The problem with his legalistic “term of art” is that it unintentionally mirrors the way perpetrators think about and rationalize their crimes. Beware of this snake with a ‘slippery tongue’. You been warned.

Another useless miniter,I don’t think he grasp what is happening in NTUC he is just jabbering away from the teleprompter just like all the BS he spouts about football & other sports. Like a foot ball he should be kicked into oblivion!

Bring your money elsewhere!

Imagine Allianz going to pay for the shares of Income… and Allianz CFO screamed: “We lost 50% of the premium!”

Esp. those policies which have surrender value, surrender it and take our money! And Allianz CFO will scream again, “We are making huge losses!”

Most of us don’t live to benefit from insurances especially when your age is older your marginal utility hits the limit and diminishes.

No punishment of business greater than no buyers;
No punishment of politicians greater than having little or no votes.

Of course everything is above board.!! Everything meaning the legal documents, the financial statements, the shareholder meetings.. etc all these things is squeaky clean. With the entire legal system at their calling.. with top notch solicitors, ex judges, even ex presidents.. what could possibly be missed..??? This how politics work..!! They will never ever do anything criminal. No way..!! But… they can be immoral (speaker of parliament) they can be unethical (only PAP can hold edusave award ceremonies) they can be cruel ( will make JB Jeyeratnam crawl on bended knees) they can be harsh (14 years to hold civil… Read more »

Ya man, if I take my insurance out of Income, any suggestions who to go to?

As though this Edwin Tong can say otherwise!!! I would think it will happen only when pigs can fly.

But we must give credit to the MIW; they really can get together and sing from the same song sheet and circle the wagons.

On the other hand, we have not heard from the opposition. I would be interested to know what they have to say.

Would LW address this issue during the NDR?

This is a done deal so it is wasting time going back and forth. Our response should be at the ballot box where we have the power.We also don’t have to buy any commodities be it insurance or financial instruments sold by any entity affiliated with the PAP or its members. In short, don’t do business with them!

Come “hell & high water'”,nothing will change,scumsinwhite have decided,what you read/hear is just papee Beiging operatic theater!!!!

This proposed sale of NTUC Income reminds me of another sale of public assets supposedly for the good of Singaporeans, ie the sale of SP (Singapore Power) distribution network to multiple private companies so that Singaporeans can “trade” electricity prices.

Anyway the site of Mid East is developing a big war – I m not war monger – Houthis, Iranians, Hizbollah, Hamas, ganging up.

Dai Gor couldn’t be wasting bullets to send aircraft carriers yhere if war drums didn’t beat.

US stocks retreated, Japan deflation, again, China in quicksand – property and bonds defaults – Eurozone nothing fabulous.

AI hype is drawing away productive resources – some uber rich only benefit.

Here? PAP continue to resort to wastage of People’s Money on their pet project of buying votes – capital spending DO NOT earn FOREX. Sheeps are DEFRAUDED, PAINFULLY.

I do not doubt the legality of the due process under Pappy. He knew it very well as he himself is a senior counsel. They have it all covered. Recusal / In Dependent Director / Change and backdate constitution for the Ah Nei staying at Istana / etc…. But what about ethics? What about perceived conflict of interest? With NTUC Enterprise majority stake in Income, what can the minority shareholders do if it has been decided and a done deal? Would be very glad to know who are these minority shareholders of Income and their political affiliation? Also the shareholding… Read more »

Pray hard for a new party. It has to take time. just be patient

I dont vote for any of the parties.

Honestly, if the sale of Income really screw locals of our insurances policies.

Which alternate insurances companies would best to replaced Income to protect our interest?

Government ministers,
Zip it.
This is a private cooperation doing their own business, nothing to do with you.

Oh, forgotten this NTUC umbrella organisation is designated a Political Sensitive Person, because of its affiliation to the current ruling political party.

Islanders beware, be wise. Don’t put all your eggs in this PSPerson basket!

We decide what is right. Never mind what the people think..

Lee Kuan Yew.

Why should a MCCY minister be making the statement? Shouldn’t ministers from MTI, MOM, PMO, etc. be the ones coming out to address the issue? Paid themselves million$, only to hide in the shadows when issues arise?

Seems like lawlanWong’s poor leadership is already showing.

When we engage a fox to guard over the chicken farm, one day the fox will think why he needs to guard the chickens and eggs for you when he can have all to himself. He seems to care and look after your assets, but will find ways to profit from them.

Just remove, deny the PAP any mandate..

Not a difficult choice.
Walk into the polling booth,
With pen in hand, just mark “X” below the PAP’s box and symbol.

And sit back and watch how rats scurry around.

Clear cut – endless raiding of SG Reserves is reaping it’s DRASTIC CONSEQUENCES on Singaporeans NOW. THIS IS REAL.

Commonly people UNDERSTAND and BELIEVE all lock stock what’s spoken.

Crucially it’s WHAT IS NOT spoken THIS IS REAL and TRUTH. The rest ALL is about PR and cosmetic reasons.

What’s the business of PAP Politicians involved in having their say?

Secondly, there’s a defensive avalanche from them trying to shift to attack – balls to you.

Credibility is ZERO.

Except adoration from sheeps, PAP is damn good.

IMO, the issue is not about due process. For sure everything is done above board, we are after all Singapore right? Money should not be the be all and end all. Many wonder if any uplifting six feet under will soon materialise?😊😊

Trending