Singapore
Prof Tommy Koh challenges Lim Boon Heng’s justification for selling majority stake in Income
Prof Tommy Koh challenges NTUC Enterprise’s sale of a majority stake in INCOME to Allianz, questioning its impact on INCOME’s mission and legacy, while Mr Lim Boon Heng argues the move strengthens INCOME’s competitiveness and financial resilience.
In a rare public disagreement, Professor Tommy Koh has openly challenged the rationale provided by Mr Lim Boon Heng, chairman of NTUC Enterprise, for selling a majority stake in Income Insurance to German insurer Allianz.
Prof Koh’s response, posted on his Facebook page on Wednesday (31 July), raises critical questions about the decision’s impact on Income’s mission and legacy.
“I am a friend and admirer of Lim Boon Heng, the chairman of NTUC Enterprise. I hope he will not be offended if I say that I am not convinced by his press conference on the reasons why Enterprise is willing to sell a majority stake in INCOME to a German insurance company,” wrote Prof Koh, Singapore’s Ambassador-at-Large at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Chairman of the Institute of Policy Studies.
He emphasized Income’s founding mission, stating, “INCOME was established as a cooperative by none other than the legendary Dr Goh Keng Swee. Its mission was to make insurance accessible and affordable to the ordinary people of Singapore. For the past 54 years, it has fulfilled its mission and looked after the insurance needs of 2 million customers.”
Prof Koh highlighted several key initiatives by Income, including the Family Micro-Insurance and Savings Scheme for low-income families and insurance coverage for children with autism.
He questioned whether a foreign company would have launched such socially responsible products, expressing concern that these initiatives might not continue under Allianz’s ownership.
Addressing the financial health of Income, Prof Koh pointed out that it has always been profitable, posing the question: “In view of this fact why does NTUC Enterprise wish to sell INCOME? Is it because it will make a profit of $1 billion?”
He concluded with a reflection on changing values in Singapore, citing the warning by Singapore’s first foreign minister, S Rajaratnam, against becoming “a nation of people who know the price of everything but the value of nothing.”
Prof Koh’s comments were in response to Mr Lim’s statement during an exclusive interview with The Straits Times on 29 July.
Mr Lim, who was a former Minister of the People’s Action Party, argued that selling the stake would strengthen Income, making it more competitive and able to offer better prices to consumers.
He noted that NTUC Enterprise would receive about S$1 billion from the deal, which could be invested in ventures related to education and health services for the elderly.
On 17 July 2024, Allianz proposed a S$2.2 billion cash deal to acquire a 51 per cent stake in Income.
The offer, priced at S$40.58 per share, represents a 37.3 per cent premium over Income’s net asset value per share as of 31 December 2023. NTUC Enterprise Co-operative, holding a 72.8 per cent stake, has irrevocably committed to accepting the offer, ensuring NTUC Enterprise will maintain a substantial shareholding post-transaction, ranging from 21.8 per cent to 49 per cent.
Mr Lim addressed several concerns during the ST interview, acknowledging that some Singaporeans might feel emotionally attached to the cooperative model of Income.
However, he stressed the importance of ensuring Income’s long-term sustainability and ability to fulfill its obligations to policyholders. He pointed out that customers buy insurance when they are young and expect payouts when they are old, which requires insurers to have a “very long tail responsibility.”
He also mentioned the challenges Income has faced in maintaining its capital adequacy ratio (CAR) during economic downturns and highlighted the need for the insurer to be able to tap into capital markets for future growth. This led to the decision to corporatize INCOME, allowing it access to mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, or an initial public offering to raise funds for expansion.
Mr Lim explained that the proposed deal with Allianz would enable Income to leverage Allianz’s global expertise and financial strength, thus enhancing its competitiveness and ability to offer better prices and products to consumers.
He emphasized that while the partnership would introduce a new dynamic, the foundational values and mission of Income should continue to be upheld, and trust would need to be earned through future actions.
Mr Tan Suee Chieh, former CEO of NTUC Income from 2007 to 2013, also shared his concerns over the acquisition of Income on his Facebook.
He quoted Allianz Group CEO Oliver Bäte, who stated in a Business Times article, “We’re not in Asia to buy top line; we want to build a resoundingly profitable business.”
He contrasted this with the values of NTUC Income under his and Mr Tan Kin Lian’s leadership, stating, “We maximised value to policyholders, but they must be sustainable and make business sense. We wanted to have as much reach to Singaporeans, not to maximise profits but to maximise social impact.”
Mr Tan Suee Chieh urged Singaporeans to speak up, saying, “I hope our leaders are making sound decisions to benefit Singaporeans in the long term. I hope things may still change if there is a public outcry. So speak up now or forever hold your peace.”
Why is this derelict still around making millions – what re his positive contributions to TomMasex?
Any measures of their performance for the many many derelicts/deadwood hiding in Gomen/GLCs & Stats Boards???
Ah Lim father last time got own property and land?
“NOT FOR SALE!” Why sell and change the very purpose it was created for.
Allianz might be well and good for now, but after becoming a majority share holder, what is there to ensure things would not change?
I agree we should not sell. NTUC INCOME was created for the common citizens to get the best value from the insurance company but sadly the financial figure offered has overtaken the original goals. Not everything should be equated with profits!
Income a pillar who supports Singaporen affordable insurance from young to old . Past 55 years.As enterprise.if no profits been made..close corporate office long ago. Just because of 1 Billion stake share earning..Don’t be too Greedy. Does any Guarantee which German insurance support Singaporen as Income did. More realistic and maintained what Income as Local Enterprise corp.
Do not sell.
INCOME, an iconic business brand of Singapore, symbolises the tripartite relationship of the People of Singapore, the Government and the Employers! Look long term to the future for the future generations to be proud of as an inheritance versus a mere pittance of dollars that cannot be .measured against it’s intrinsic legacy that will hold fond memories of the achievements on the
visions of the founding fathers of the ruling PAP of the past years.
NTUC role has not changed even till today. We need them to remain social enterprise focus in this time of profit driven corporation. Check on the real motive for selling. I doubt we need the money . I am a strong supporter of their insurance business as I find them socially responsible and ethical
There are certain G1 provisions and establishments which are Singaporean and for the benefit of Singaporeans and to meet their needs. They should not be sold to foreign corporations for profit. An example of this practice is the sale of numerous British establishments to US corporations which use the billions in profits to pay ridiculously huge salaries to their senior management and top executives widening the income gap. Every year huge profits get channeled from Britain across the Atlantic to the US.
It’s far better to admit a mistake done in selling the insurance to Alliace rather then trying to defend it. The mission was to serve Singaporeans as commented by someone not to Alliance, and if this is true why was it sold in the first place. I am just giving my views as a citizen. I have got no shares nothing whatsoever. Hope the matter will be settled amicably.
Gahmen bankrupt already. Selling everything. Remind me of the Philippines during Ramos time.
Where will Lim Boon Heng be 5 years from now?
Will he be answerable if Allianz will not do what NTUC enterprise desire?
Lim would have gone fishing and the affected insured customers of the Allianz will just have to go pound sand with no recourse.
He tells islanders now that the proceed from the 51% sales will be used for this and that good things. Why didn’t they say so before?
Listening to this is like listen to bull’s manure.
“He noted that NTUC Enterprise would receive about S$1 billion from the deal, which could be invested in ventures related to education and health services for the elderly.” – LBH This is where future money could be made. In the name of moderating food & grocery price, NTUC has Fairprice. Just wondering how they achieve that if their stuffs are more expensive than elsewhere? Is it for others to increase their price to match their expensive one to moderate price? With their economy of scale, they are there to rip consumers. They are in all businesses (Fairprice / Kopitiam foodcourts… Read more »
It is beginning to be a well scripted wayang.
One say its a good deal
One says its a bad deal
Good cop vs Bad cop playbook..
Both are cut from the same cloth.
Both have been long time friends of PAP
(including both Tan Kin Lian & Tan Sue Chieh)
The subject, INCOME Insurance is a done deal
Parliament statements will remind everyone that it is private enterprise decision
and Government has no control.
The people can scream, but the PAP will simply repeat..
There is only one avenue:
Change the Government.
There is no other way.
Without checks and balances the sale of NTUC Income has all the tell tale signs of ‘UNSEEN CORRUPTION’. Take Keppel Corp CORRUPTION, in SG they declared like Can’t Find any Evidence of CORRUPTION, when HIGHER UPS Politicians seems to be SEEN to be involved. Why the PAP Administration NOT Argue on Keppel’s behalf to 🇺🇸 DoJ Keppel’s NOT guilty when CPIB found no evidence as claimed in SG Pariahment. Being the case so, ** IS this PAP STUPID NOT to DEMAND a retrial or SEEK REFUND of 100s of 1,000,000s of DOLLARS paid? ** Perhaps always the case, it’s NOT… Read more »
Is NTUC Income in financial distress? Because otherwise, “growth”, “competitiveness and financial resilience” is NOT its mission. It is like Lim Boon Heng is trying to justifying GREATER profitability for a Not-For-Profit organisation which is COMPLETELY counter to its mission.
Perhaps Lim Boon Heng should be justifying NOT wasting money buying submarines and especially that piece of junk the F-35 fighter jets for the SAF since defending Singapore is at most a minor role for it.
It is the Singaporean that made Income what it is today. So henceforth Singaporeans should look and support foreign entities. We are just being used over and over. We need to stop this at the next ballot box.
Good try Professor, but, … when this regime, which ostensibly signs off everything that happens on the island, … can and did raise GST against a backdrop of struggling citizens against an ultra~elevated cost of living, increased utilities, lean job market, … … one must accept that the writing is on the wall, and in BOLD PRINT !!!
Selling us out again while shedding crocodile’s tears, boon heng? Since pap sells us out once again, we will vote them out. Sama Sama.
Catch a ticket to see Change before your time on earth expires. Seats are limited for the movie. Many waited over 60 years and died without seeing the movie Change
You serve the hand that fed you extreme wealth. My puppy is loyal to me
Prof Koh, please do good for the future of SG. Go talk to WP Pritam Singh or PSP Dr Tan’s and get hands-on on the next GE grab a GRC