Connect with us

Singapore

PSP Chairman Tan Cheng Bock questions Income’s broken promises on 2022 corporatisation

Dr Tan Cheng Bock questions NTUC Income’s broken promise to maintain NTUC Enterprise as the majority shareholder after corporatisation, as Allianz aims to acquire 51% of the shares.

Published

on

Dr Tan Cheng Bock, Chairman of the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), has raised concerns over whether NTUC Income has reneged on its 2022 promise to maintain NTUC Enterprise as its majority shareholder following its corporatisation.

In a Facebook post on Saturday, Dr Tan questioned the integrity of the assurances made by NTUC Income’s CEO, Andrew Yeo, in light of recent developments. A German insurance company, Allianz, has proposed to acquire at least 51% of NTUC Income’s shares, with NTUC Enterprise seemingly poised to sell its majority stake. Currently, NTUC Enterprise holds 72.8% of the shares in NTUC Income.

The announcement by Allianz on 17 July revealed its intention to purchase a controlling stake in NTUC Income, offering S$40.58 per share, valuing the transaction at S$2.2 billion.

In January 2022, NTUC Income transitioned from a worker’s co-operative insurer to a company, attracting significant public scrutiny.

The public questioned whether the move would compromise NTUC Income’s status as a social enterprise, established in 1970 to provide affordable insurance to low-income Singaporean workers.

In response, Mr Yeo assured in a letter to the Straits Times Forum that the corporatisation was a mere change in legal form and that NTUC Enterprise would continue as the majority shareholder.

“We would like to clarify that although Income was established as a cooperative in 1970 to provide essential insurance to underserved workers in Singapore, it is neither not-for-profit nor non-profit. We must first be a thriving and sustainable enterprise before we can fulfil our social commitments.”

“The corporatisation exercise changes only Income’s legal form from a cooperative to a non-listed corporate entity. The new entity will remain an NTUC social enterprise. NTUC Enterprise will continue to be the majority shareholder of the new entity,” wrote Mr Yeo.

This assurance was also documented in the minutes of the Annual General Meeting of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited in May 2022.

“Post-corporatisation, NTUC Enterprise will continue to be the majority shareholder of the new company, Income Insurance Limited,” the minutes stated.

However, Dr Tan highlighted that this promise appears at risk of being broken.

“A German insurance company, Allianz has offered to buy ‘at least’ 51% of the shares in NTUC Income. Surprisingly, NTUC Enterprise looks set to sell its shares to make Allianz the new majority shareholder in Income. That would be a big promise broken,” Dr Tan wrote.

Dr Tan pointed out that NTUC Enterprise has not backed Andrew Yeo’s promise to remain the majority shareholder.

Dr Tan urged the government to explain why this promise, made just two years ago, appears to be in jeopardy.

“NTUC Enterprise has not backed Andrew Yeo’s promise to remain the majority shareholder. And Singaporeans deserve to know why. The Government should explain why this promise, made about 2 years ago, has been broken so quickly,” Dr Tan concluded.

Former NTUC Income CEO, Tan Suee Chieh also voiced opposition to the sale, stating in a Facebook post, “Income has not only reversed its 2022 commitment to maintain NE [NTUC Entreprise] as the majority shareholder, but NE would also crystallise a significant capital gain through the sale of its shares. This gain, I argued in 2022, should be more fairly distributed to those shareholders who invested before NTUC Enterprise’s capital injection in 2015-2020.”

Serving as CEO from 2009 to 2013, Mr Tan had cautioned against the corporatisation of NTUC Income in 2022, calling for provisions to protect NTUC Income’s mission.

He advocated “for a fairer distribution of equity gains for shareholders who invested before NTUC Enterprise’s capital injection, but without success.”

He brought his concerns to the Monetary Authority of Singapore, which shared them with the Registrar of Cooperatives. However, the Registrar of Cooperatives declined to intervene.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
26 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
26 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Once its privatized or more entities are privatized, where did the momeny goes? Initially thier cpaital comes from where?tsk tsk tsk

Now we know, there’s expiry date in each of their promises, which is 2 years !

Co~operative, then corporatisation and finally, and ultimately and definitively, … compromised !!!

Pay heed to what our WISE old man have spoken ‘” he has eaten more salt then you – rice, he crossed more bridges than the pathways you walk” Pay heed, pay heed before everything come pass & reset to ignominy.

TCB be like Trump. Come back to help the people. Make Singapore great again!!!

Once a while we will have a great singapore sale. tsk tsk tsk

Many national entities in Singapore have been sold out by this white termite colony over these past few decades.
PSP’s TCB must shout out loud “Lets us all Singaporeans make Singapore GREAT again!!!”
Vote wisely in this coming election, if not one day this white termite colony might even sell all Singaporeans out…lol.

Hope to see Dr Tan Cheng Bock wrestle West Coast GRC in the coming GE.

And a few more GRC wins by WP in the East and North East.

Target 30 to 40+ opposition MP in Parliament after next GE

Cheng Bock still going strong!!!! Good To See That!!! Bruuuder
The minute NTUC kena FICA, already suspicious lah.
Now this Sale to Germany’s Useful Idiot: Olaf hehehe. Allianz.
If this is A National Asset & if it’s making a Profit—- which by right it should in SG. Unless got many lobang claims paid out.

Now how will the Terms Change after Aquisition???
I see the deal going through as usual.
So my question is The Most Important Question???

As of now, this Andrew Yeo character seem very quiet. Never heard anything from him since the start of the saga. Either waiting for instruction to speak or went into hiding?

Has such typical traits to be a Pappy politicians. Trust Pappy can shortlist him for upcoming GE to represent residents to voice their concerns in ParLeeMen.

VTO. VTO.

In light of this revelation.
Will islanders continue to believe the establishment?
Will they believe what ntuc enterprise Chairman Lim Boon Heng promised a few days ago?

Well, they will be disappointed down the road, if they continue to be naive.
How unfortunate that this Fantasy Island is in this predicament.

It’s all about money to the moneyed people on the top. Can check who are the ultimate beneficiaries of the share sales? Must be who’s who and all their kakis and kins. All laughing to the bank with tonnes of money.

Looks like the corporatisation move in 2022 was a well planned strategy to sell 51% of NTUC INCOME to Allianz. There was no earthly reason to change the legal status of a cooperative to a non-listed corporate entity. What was the benefit for this change of legal status then?

It can only be concluded that the corporatisation exercise was specifically to prepare for the sale. It just leads one to think the discussion with Allianz was held perhaps 2 to 3 years prior to corporatisation.

The losses sustained by Income for whatever reasons, must be so substantial, into the billions?that NTUC enterprise may not have the moneys to support Income continue operation under SG stringent capital requirements for Insurance companies to do business in Singapore.Given no white knight from TH control stable of GLCs emerge to-date,NTUC enterprise have no option but to negate on their 2022 promise to off load more than 51 percent of Income shares to White knight Allianz for S$2.2billions.Sad though, Income need liquidity to survive otherwise the alternative will be to close shop for good!!!.One might ask, what truely transpired that… Read more »

Andrew Yeo broke his promise, NTUC Enterprise (NE) broke his promise. If union members like to know whether they ( NE & Andrew) can be held accountable, the only way is for members to conduct a class action suit to sue NE for failing to maintain majority shares ‘promises’. Let the legal course runs and we will know whether there are justice. Being an enterprise and fulfiling social commitments never co-exist. Andrew Yeo: “The corporatisation exercise changes only Income’s legal form from a cooperative to a non-listed corporate entity. ” Change from a cooperative to a non listed corporate entity… Read more »

Broken promise is inline with the fact that nothing lasts forever. Even power will be lost one day.

Naive Singaporeans who have always felt Singapore must not have Opposition MP may wake up from this episode. If there is no one who dare to question the white, what’s gonna happen to these naive Singaporeans who thinks that the gov must not be questioned as if it’s emperor. These are pathetic betrayers of democracy

“I am often accused of interfering in the private lives of citizens. Yes, if I did not, had I not done that, we wouldn’t be here today. And I say without the slightest remorse, that we wouldn’t be here, we would not have made economic progress, if we had not intervened on very personal matters – who your neighbour is, how you live, the noise you make, how you spit, or what language you use. We decide what is right. Never mind what the people think.” ― Lee Kuan Yew Speech to the National Day Rally in 1986, quoted in… Read more »

Trending