Connect with us

Singapore

Income claims chairman recused himself from appointing Morgan Stanley as adviser in Allianz deal

Income Insurance stated that chairman Ronald Ong recused himself from appointing Morgan Stanley as adviser for the Allianz deal amid concerns over a conflict of interest, given Ong’s role as chairman of Income and his position as chairman of Morgan Stanley’s Southeast Asia business for over 20 years.

Published

on

Income Insurance said in a statement on Saturday (27 July) that Mr Ronald Ong, the chairman of Income Insurance, had recused himself from the board’s decision to appoint Morgan Stanley as the exclusive financial adviser for the sale of NTUC Enterprise’s shares in the company to German MNC Allianz.

This announcement followed vocal concerns raised about a potential conflict of interest due to Mr Ong’s roles at both Income Insurance and Morgan Stanley.

“Morgan Stanley was appointed as Income Insurance’s financial advisor after a considered selection process.”

“They were appointed based on their prior insurance transaction credentials, the experience of their deal team, and their deep understanding of Income Insurance.”

Income Insurance clarified that an audit committee had reviewed the appointment before the board’s approval.

The insurer emphasized that none of its directors are connected to Allianz, ensuring independence in their recommendation regarding the offer.

“In line with good corporate governance, the board will establish an independent board committee chaired by the lead independent director and wholly comprising independent directors, to select and appoint an independent financial adviser,” Income Insurance added.

“The advice of the independent financial adviser to the board on whether to recommend shareholders to accept or reject the offer will be set out in the composite document.”

Controversy Over Ong’s Many Hats in Controversial Deal

The deal, which positions Allianz to become the largest shareholder in Income Insurance, has stirred public concern. Allianz announced on 17 July its intention to purchase 51 per cent of Income Insurance’s shares, offering S$40.58 (US$30.20) per share, with a transaction value of S$2.2 billion.

Currently, NTUC Enterprise holds a 72.8 per cent stake in Income Insurance and will remain a substantial shareholder if the sale proceeds. However, this move has sparked backlash, with critics fearing it may compromise Income’s commitment to Singapore’s workers.

Concerns have also been raised about a potential conflict of interest involving Mr Ong and his long history with Morgan Stanley, which had been appointed the deal’s exclusive financial adviser.

Mr Ong has been with Morgan Stanley for more than 24 years and currently serves as the Chairman and CEO for Southeast Asia.

His dual roles have prompted questions about the integrity of the decision-making process behind the appointment of Morgan Stanley as the financial advisor.

Mr Ong was co-opted to the Board of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited on 23 August 2018 and later elected as a non-independent non-executive director on 24 May 2019.

Since 1 August 2022, he has been the Chairman of the Board and Board Executive Committee of Income Insurance Limited.

Additionally, he serves as a Board Member of NTUC Enterprise Co-operative Limited, the majority owner of Income Insurance.

Professor Mak Yuen Teen, a corporate governance expert and former Vice Dean of the NUS Business School, expressed his astonishment on LinkedIn.

“So his firm is the financial adviser, and he’s chairman of Income and chair of its exco, and director of Enterprise. I certainly hope he’s not involved in the decision to appoint MS [Morgan Stanley] as financial adviser as MAS CG guidelines for FIs state that directors should recuse if they have a conflict of interest,” he wrote.

Retired banker Chris Kuan also voiced his concerns on Facebook, highlighting the potential conflict of interest involving Mr Ong and other key figures in NTUC Enterprise.

Kuan stated, “Thanks to a Biz Times report, we now know that Income’s chairman is on the board of NTUC Enterprise, the majority owner who sold to Allianz. Income’s deputy chairman is NTUC Enterprises’ CEO. NTUC Enterprises’ best interest may not be in the best interest of Income. Having these executives from NTUC Enterprises in key decision-making positions of Income in the event of a sale is a clear conflict of interest and can only be resolved if the two of them recuse themselves from the decision to sell 51% of Income.”

When Income Insurance corporatised in 2022, shareholders were assured that NTUC Enterprise would continue as the majority shareholder. This assurance was documented in the minutes of the Annual General Meeting of NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative Limited in May 2022. “Post-corporatisation, NTUC Enterprise will continue to be the majority shareholder of the new company, Income Insurance Limited,” the minutes stated.

Former NTUC Income CEO, Tan Suee Chieh also voiced against the sale, stating in a Facebook post, “Income has not only reversed its 2022 commitment to maintain NE as the majority shareholder, but NE would also crystallise a significant capital gain through the sale of its shares. This gain, I argued in 2022, should be more fairly distributed to those shareholders who invested before NTUC Enterprise’s capital injection in 2015-2020.”

Serving as CEO from 2009 to 2013, Mr Tan had cautioned against the corporatisation of NTUC Income in 2022, calling for provisions to protect NTUC Income’s mission.

He advocated “for a fairer distribution of equity gains for shareholders who invested before NTUC Enterprise’s capital injection, but without success.” He brought his concerns to the Monetary Authority of Singapore, which shared them with the Registrar of Cooperatives. However, the Registrar of Cooperatives declined to intervene.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
10 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I believe that as much as I believe pigs can fly

Recusing oneself, … works, if all parties involved is sufficiently desperate for the deal to be done, … to close one’s eyes, ears and mouths, .. and sign on the dotted line, knowing full well, that it’ll be outwardly condemned !!!

Don’t blame Monetary Authority of Singapore or Registrar of Cooperatives, if they didn’t intervene, it is probably instructions from those higher up eg. pap.

The word “Recuse” is now very popular amongst the cronies of PAP. It is like “don’t pass me the puck”!

Under a well controlled system where nepotism and cronyism previal as a norm,recursor is their only defence against glaring conflict of interest which actions seem to be acceptable to the power to be.This may the reason why the ugly face of rotting governance kept appearing like nobody’s business of late in our once Sunny Singapore.

The act of recusing oneself is over-used of late. SM Lee recusing himself from the Oxley committee. MInister Shamugan recusing himself from Rideout rental saga. And now Mr Ong recusing himself from Income.
It’s like 7-Eleven telling would be robbers that their till only has no more than $200 after midnight.

I earn 200 dollars per hour working from home on an online job. I never thought I could accomplish it, but my best friend makes $10,000 per month doing this profession and that I learn more about it.
.
.
.
For Details►—————————➤ 𝐖𝐰𝐰.𝐉𝐨𝐢𝐧.𝐏𝐚𝐲𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐞𝟗.𝐜𝐨𝐦

Trending