Singapore
Former NTUC Income CEO criticizes sale to Allianz, citing broken promises and threats to social mission
Former NTUC Income CEO Tan Suee Chieh criticized the proposed sale of a 51% stake in Income Insurance to Allianz, calling it a betrayal of NTUC Income’s social mission. Tan argued that the deal contradicts assurances given in 2022 that NTUC Enterprise would remain the majority shareholder.
In a sharply worded commentary published on Channel News Asia, former NTUC Income CEO Tan Suee Chieh expressed strong opposition to the proposed sale of a 51% stake in Income Insurance to German insurer Allianz, describing it as a betrayal of the social mission that has guided the company since its inception.
Tan served as the CEO of NTUC Income between 2007 and 2013 and was the former Group CEO of NTUC Enterprise between 2013 and 2017.
In his piece, Tan highlighted that the sale, which comes just two years after NTUC Income’s corporatisation, directly contradicts the assurances given in 2022.
At that time, NTUC Income transitioned from a co-operative to a corporation, with promises that NTUC Enterprise would remain the majority shareholder and that the company’s mission and values would remain intact.
“There is no investment to improve Income Insurance’s capabilities, regional or technological – something emphasized in 2022,” Tan wrote. “Instead, the deal appears to be a mechanism for NTUC Enterprise and other shareholders to cash out with substantial gains.”
Tan pointed out that the assurance given in 2022, which was communicated to him in writing by the Independent Directors of NTUC Income, has been breached in less than two years.
“With these as a backdrop, it is hard to regard any further commitments made seriously,” he noted.
Contrasting Ethos and Culture
Tan expressed concern that the sale to Allianz would undermine the core values and identity of Income Insurance.
“The prospect of a foreign entity owning a majority stake in Income Insurance is unsettling, considering the deep emotional ties Singaporeans have with NTUC Income and its spirit and values as a co-operative,” he said.
He emphasized that Income Insurance could lose its “People before Profits” philosophy under Allianz’s profit-driven ethos.
Allianz CEO Oliver Bäte’s recent statements about wanting to “build a resoundingly profitable business” and focusing on shareholder value were cited by Tan as stark contrasts to NTUC Income’s historical mission of maximizing social impact rather than profits.
A Viable Social Enterprise Model
Tan argued that it is not necessary for socially motivated businesses to be part of a multinational group to succeed. He highlighted NTUC Income’s superior cost efficiency compared to multinationals operating in Singapore and pointed out that many successful single-country co-operatives exist worldwide.
“If Income Insurance remains an independent social enterprise, there has to be a fundamental review of its product suites, if capital requirements are such a concern,” Tan suggested.
He emphasized that access to Allianz’s asset management capabilities could be obtained without selling the company.
What Singaporeans Need
Tan underscored the need for a diversity of business models in Singapore’s financial services industry, advocating for companies focused on customer value rather than shareholder profits. He stressed that Income Insurance should concentrate on transparent, value-for-money health, term, and personal insurance products, which are essential for Singaporeans.
“Income Insurance can be a force for good in price moderation for these essential products, and a standard bearer in customer experience, transparency, and fairness in claims settlement,” Tan wrote.
He noted that many heartlanders prefer dealing with Income Insurance due to trust and emotional resonance.
Call to Preserve the Social Mission
Tan concluded his commentary by calling for the preservation of Income Insurance’s social mission and values. He emphasized the importance of protecting the interests of all stakeholders and honoring the commitments made during the capital injection from NTUC Enterprise and the 2022 corporatisation.
“Income Insurance must remain dedicated to serving the people of Singapore and not the shareholders of Allianz Europe BV, putting people before profits – not the other way round,” Tan asserted.
“Did Raymond Ong float the idea to Lim Boon Heng in NTUC Enrerprise…..”
What is this derelict doing in NTUC & Tomasex – shoud be PASTURED along time ago or sold to the “glue” factory for re-cyc[ing
“calling it a betrayal of NTUC Income’s social mission.”
Is this the only one betrayal by the papee fellows?????? Uncountable more likely!!!!!
Whilst the deal may be a done deal, the question to ask is “who floated this idea of selling Income”
Did Raymond Ong float the idea to Lim Boon Heng in NTUC Enrerprise and did he float the idea to Allianze in his role as CEO of Morgan Stanley.
If he did and then recommended Morgan Stanley to be the deal maker, then it’s meaningless to recuse himself at a later stage.
As usual, nobody from the 4G is going to come in and say something and hope everything will just fade away
Criticise, comment and condemn as much and as strongly as you so wish, but, … the deal is done and so what, if promises were broken !!!
It’s not like SillyPore allows policyholders to protest against this or that there exists a strong lobbyist group culture, … to counter against such “bad decisions” !!!
Until such events and circumstances such as this, … it’s worth remembering it is what the majority have nurtured and created with their votes !!!
Sometimes I couldn’t understand Singaporean’s thinking. 😂 When an event like Income sales happens with broken promises ain’t a civic way was to sue the privatized entity? Ain’t taking legal action best way of seeking justice? Ain’t if a person being cheated twice (or more) by the same entity proofs that the problem doesn’t lies on the entity but the person who was cheated? Ain’t if all thing fails, the best way is to walk out with your money? Terminate the policy, bring your money elsewhere? And when the group is large enough, set up your own cooperative again? Tell… Read more »
So much controversey from the start …not good.
Only thinking of profits.
Even sg giving mil$ of aid to Gaza …its not f.o.c.
During peace times in the ffuture SG will expect some financial returns eg trade or investment opportunities..
Even in war theres money to be made!
Testing Water for GE. How people will react to this event as NTUC is a SG Brand Name!!!!
Not Bad, Good Try.
This could be one of many constructs that the PAP has lined up to get votes. Create the illusion that they are “listening” by first orchestrating some event that people dont like. then, making announcements that they will not go ahead with plans. The path to this method was already evident when they changed their registration from a co-operative to an unlisted company. This was in 2022. Many noticed it, especially those who are now commenting on it. These people are not ordinary people but are well connected, and have knowledge of how companies are set up and their purpose.… Read more »
One thing that is missing from Allianz and NTUC – how would the policy-holders gain (eg: better coverage, reduced premiums from scale of operations, etc) from this over this buy-out? If the benefit to the policy holders is not talked about, then it is very likely there is NO BENEFIT.
A very very simple question to answer, both from Allianz and NTUC.
If there’s NO GOLD to mine at Income Insurance, why would Allianz pour money, to dig shit? Is Allianz the BIGGEST ACHTUNG Fools.
And if there’s NO GAINS to LINE their Effking pockets and BALLOON their Bank Accounts, why sell.
Assurance IS JUST a buy time lie.
Political consequences vs business decision…
Your choice, PAPy..
you are in control no??
I hope NTUC Income & NTUC Enterprise will remain steadfast in their commitment in
selling to Allianz… to show how steady they are.
And voters will remember… and vote out the PAP.
NTUC… !!.. stay the course… !!!
Organize a class action suit to sue for broken promises.
And the public will see for themselves whether there are justice.
Cheat me once, shame on you;
Cheat me twice, shame on me.
Or, will the members & policy holders restart another cooperative and say good bye to NTUC Enterprise? Will you punish the promise breaker by moving your money away.
1) “At that time, NTUC Income transitioned from a co-operative to a corporation, with promises that NTUC Enterprise would remain the majority shareholder and that the company’s mission and values would remain intact”.
Comment: looks like an integrity issue (or lack thereof) on the part of NTUC Income.
2) “With these as a backdrop, it is hard to regard any further commitments made seriously,” he noted”.
Comment: what Mr Tan Suee Chieh is saying ” you have lied before. How to believe you henceforth?”
The assurances by Lim Boon Heng ring very hollow in the face of this latest information.
NTUC income BALLs being squeezed left right & center ho say liou aaahhh