Connect with us

International

ICJ rules Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory unlawful

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory is unlawful and must end swiftly. The nonbinding advisory opinion, read by President Nawaf Salam, cited violations of international law, including settlement expansion, resource exploitation, and discriminatory policies.

Published

on

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has issued a landmark ruling declaring Israel’s continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory as unlawful, calling for its end “as rapidly as possible”.

Nawaf Salam, president of the ICJ in The Hague, read the nonbinding advisory opinion on Friday, 19 July.

The 15-judge panel outlined various policies, including the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, exploitation of natural resources, annexation, and discriminatory policies against Palestinians, all of which were deemed violations of international law.

The court asserted that Israel has no right to sovereignty over the territories, is breaching international laws against acquiring territory by force, and is obstructing Palestinians’ right to self-determination.

The ICJ stated that other nations are obliged not to assist in maintaining Israel’s presence in the territory. The court emphasized that Israel must halt settlement construction immediately and dismantle existing settlements. Israel’s “abuse of its status as the occupying power” makes its presence in the occupied Palestinian territory unlawful, the court said.

The ruling was sought by the United Nations General Assembly in 2022. The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is the highest UN body for hearing disputes between states.

Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem in the 1967 war. It has since established and expanded settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and had settlements in Gaza before a 2005 withdrawal. The UN and most of the international community consider these territories as Israeli-occupied.

Reactions

Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad Maliki described the ruling as a “watershed moment for Palestine, for justice and for international law”. He urged all states to uphold their obligations by ceasing any support for Israel’s illegal occupation.

Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, called the ruling a “significant step” towards ending the occupation and securing the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including self-determination, statehood, and the right of return for Palestinians displaced in 1948 and 1967. Mansour vowed to work with allies to draft a comprehensive resolution at the UN General Assembly.

In contrast, Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs dismissed the opinion as “fundamentally wrong” and one-sided. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office condemned the ruling as a “decision of lies” that distorts the truth, asserting that “the Jewish people are not occupiers in their own land”.

Ongoing Cases

In a separate case brought by South Africa, the ICJ is examining allegations that Israel is committing genocide in its war on Gaza. A preliminary ruling has already instructed Israel to prevent and punish incitement to genocide and to enhance humanitarian aid provisions.

In May, the ICJ ordered Israel to halt its offensive on Rafah in southern Gaza, citing “immense risk” to the hundreds of thousands of Palestinians seeking shelter there. Despite the order, Israel has continued its attacks on Gaza, including Rafah, in defiance of the UN court.

This ICJ ruling marks a significant development in the international legal landscape concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, highlighting the urgent need for a resolution that respects international law and the rights of the Palestinian people.

Recent Developments

On Wednesday, 17 July, Israel’s parliament, the Knesset, passed a resolution rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. The resolution received significant support, with 68 votes in favor and just nine against, according to Israeli media reports.

It was co-sponsored by parties within Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, alongside right-wing opposition parties, and even received backing from Benny Gantz’s centrist National Unity party. Notably, lawmakers from Opposition Leader Yair Lapid’s center-left Yesh Atid party chose to leave the plenum rather than vote, despite Lapid’s previous support for a two-state solution. Opposition came only from members of the Labor, Ra’am, and Hadash-Ta’al parties.

This decision aligns with the Knesset’s historical stance against Palestinian statehood. In February, the Knesset passed a similar resolution addressing the unilateral creation of a Palestinian state without Israel’s consent.

As Israel’s war on Gaza continues, resulting in over 38,000 Palestinian deaths in nearly nine months, Tel Aviv has also taken “illegal steps” in the occupied West Bank.

The left-wing Israeli movement Peace Now reported on 4 July that the government has “legalized” three more settlement outposts. “The Higher Planning Council (HPC) approved in early July the advancement of 5,295 housing units in dozens of settlements throughout the West Bank,” Peace Now said in a statement. The building plans include the expansion of settlements deep within the West Bank and the legalization of three outposts.

According to Israeli estimates, more than 720,000 Israelis reside in settlements in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. The Israeli military had earlier announced the seizure of 12,715 dunams (1 dunam = 1,000 square meters) of Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank. Settlement outposts are small communities established by illegal Israeli settlers on privately owned Palestinian land without approval from the Israeli government.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
65 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
65 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Palestine say sorry to Israel. Oppression does not mean you can resort to terrorism. The world is watching

Best to ban those Hamas lovers here. they are promoting terrorism indirectly by condemning Israel.

Haiyah …. I tot the banning of some 90plus social media accounts included some here. 🙂

Moniker PikuChoo in mandarin literal translation means PIG ASSHOLE

Did ICJ rule the Huthi drone attack in Tel Aviv the day before as unlawful? No? No problems, Israel doesn’t wait for ICJ to lay eggs and scratches its own balls to look “useful”; the Israelis simply blasted the Huthi port of Hodeidav in Yemen yesterday.

Israel was peaceful before 7th October 2023. Please get your facts right. How did Israel became genocide?

The universal rules for the goyim do not apply to the “chosen”.

Apparently, God has given the “chosen” a blank cheque to do what they want in the lands they occupy or will occupy.

ICJ = Are you still dreaming? The Houthis are still firing missiles at Israel. You calles Israel genocides? HAHAHAHAHAHA!! LMAO !!!!

ICJ= I C Jealous. LOL

Well done Israel. !!! WE are all behind you. (sayno to terrorism)

What was Palestine previously known as? (Judea)

How did Judea came about? [Romans Empire}

Which land did the Romans Empire took ? [Israel}

Palestine did no owned any land in 1948 in Israel. If it does, they will not tell the UN to grant them a state.

Last edited 1 month ago by john lim

S2

Last edited 1 month ago by Blankslate

Did ICJ rule the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014 as unlawful?
Did ICJ rule the claims by China to almost the whole SEA as unlawful?
Did ICJ rule the Westerns taking Australia from the Indigenous People as unlawful?
Did ICJ rule that persecution and expulsion of Yemeni Jews from their ancestorial homeland in Yemen as unlawful?
etc.
etc.
etc.

If Palestine is the occupier of Israel or owns part of Israel, why ask the world or UN to grant them a state status?

So who is the actual occupier of Israel? the Jews or Palestinians?

ICJ rules Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory unlawful.
Do you mean Israel did not occupy Israel long ago?

Who occupied Israel for centuries? Palestinians?

Soon to be president Trump will totally IGNORE this ruling. Unfortunately.

This ruling is about 70 years too late. But better late than never I suppose.

Countries like China do not recognise ICJ rulings, can we expect Israel to recognise this ruling?
Therefore we can expect China to stay silent on this.

The US, Canada and Australia have begun the process of identifying the illegal settlors, refusing them visas and sanctioning them. Singapore should do the same. However are we going to welcome Israel’s Finance Minister who lives in an illegal settlement?

Permanent Overlords at both sides. Tharman with his no string attached show supposedly telling the newbies or Ukraine, hey we ain’t into slavery. But on the other side when you are no longer the newbies … Russian says be enslaved and we will count you as a headcount with no guarantee pass. And unless u agree on slavery term meaning collecting dead asset… You are on ur own. Who are the overlords?! The rich father mother on one side and daughters sons on the other.no?! And becos they own both sides. They can switch anytime just for a show. No?!?

Great news, wonderful news, excellent news, … for Hamas, it’s patriots, it’s fans and it’s supporters from the river to the sea and back again !!!

Oops, … spoiler alert, spoiler alert !!!

Don’t think Israel will be the least interested in ICJ’s ruling !!!

It’ll have the same impact as ICC’s arrest warrant for Putin, Netanyahu and Hamas leaders, … … which is, absolutely nothing apart from making headlines and creating worldwide attention !!!

Except the victims

Who cares

Trending