Civil society condemns AGC’s prosecution of Ariffin Sha over retracted miscarriage story

SINGAPORE: 46 organisations and individuals in Singapore’s civil society have issued a joint statement to condemn the Attorney- -General’s Chambers (AGC)’s decision to charge Ariffin Sha, the administrator of Wake Up Singapore (WUSG) with criminal defamation for a story that the platform retracted, apologised for and corrected two years ago.

The joint statement, issued on Wednesday (15 May), expressed deep concern over Ariffin’s subjected to multiple rounds of investigations, culminating in what was deemed as a disproportionately punitive measure.

The statement noted that the hallmark of a healthy media environment is one where peers in the media have ownership over best practices, proactively address mistakes, and publications are able to self-correct, demonstrating transparency and accountability when there are lapses, without state intervention.

The group acknowledged that upon recognizing their error, WUSG promptly retracted the story, issued an unreserved apology, and provided a comprehensive and transparent account of the incident.

The group noted that it is significant that all this was done before even the POFMA order was issued, indicating that, in fact, there was no need for the state to step in. WUSG also complied with the POFMA order right away.

“Given all this, the AGC’s decision to charge Ariffin with criminal defamation two years after the fact is bizarre, ” the joint statement wrote.

Organisations and individuals endorsed the statement to show solidarity with Ariffin are peers in civil society and independent media workers.

Among them are: Workers Make Possible, Migrant Workers Singapore, SgpforPalestine48, Function 8, New Naratif,  For The Children SG, Transformative Justice Collective, writer Alfian Sa’at, Theatre Practitioner Han Xuemei, Kirsten Han, Roy Ngerng and others.

Last month, Mr Ariffin was charged in court for allegedly publishing a misleading article online that claimed a woman suffered a miscarriage due to mishandling at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital (KKH).

The article, titled “The baby is probably dead – Woman shares a harrowing account of her miscarriage at KKH A&E,” was posted on 23 March 2022, on the website and social media pages of WUSG.

The story alleged that the woman miscarried after a prolonged four-hour wait for COVID-19 treatment and abdominal pain management at KKH’s Accident & Emergency Department on 28 February 2022.

KKH responded by filing a police report two days after the article was published.

WUSG had earlier issued an apology after the woman featured in the article admitted to fabricating her story.

Lack of justification for such disproportionately punitive criminal charges

The civil society group emphasized the lack of justification for such disproportionately punitive criminal charges, which only serve to reinforce fear and censorship, further diminishing the already limited and under-resourced independent media landscape.

Highlighting their status as volunteers within civil society and independent media spaces, they acknowledged operating with minimal capacity.

While committed to responsibly serving Singaporean communities and readers, they lamented their stretched resources and the unequal playing field they must navigate.

“We work in a precarious and hostile environment where we are over-policed and under-supported. ”

“A punitive culture in which media workers have to worry about being sued, fined or jailed when we fall short is an environment in which no one can be brave enough to take any risks or report on stories that are difficult yet important to tell.”

The group decried how laws have been used in Singapore against civil society and independent media work.

The group condemned the use of laws in Singapore against civil society and independent media work, citing instances where civil and criminal defamation laws, alongside legislation such as amended contempt laws and POFMA, have been wielded against activists, opposition figures, bloggers, and independent media outlets.

“When these laws are applied, they can have the effect of silencing activists, independent media workers and civilians.”

“The imbalance in who speaks or can be heard gets further entrenched, to the detriment of all Singaporeans. We are reminded of how out-matched the average Singaporean is by the resources of the state or people in powerful, well- paid positions.”

Expressing concern over the loss of several independent media voices in recent years, including the closure of The Online Citizen in 2021 due to government harassment and legal action, they emphasized the critical need to preserve independent voices that challenge dominant narratives and expose uncomfortable truths.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Workers Make Possible (@workersmakepossible)