Comments
Netizens support PSP to question govt’s S$40M spending post-SimplyGo U-turn
Commenting in support of PSP NCMP Leong Mun Wai’s seeking of clarification from the government in the coming Parliamentary sitting, netizens also call to scrutinize the logic of an extra S$40 million to keep the old card payment system after LTA’s SimplyGo U-turn.
On Monday (22 January), Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat announced the cancellation of the Land Transport Authority’s (LTA) original plan to transition to SimplyGo and replace older public transport payment cards after facing public backlash.
In a recent Facebook post, Leong Mun Wai, Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) from the Progress Singapore Party (PSP), commended Transport Minister Chee for addressing the issues and expressed anticipation for government clarification on the announced S$40 million spending in February’s Parliament session.
The online community is urging both PSP NCMPs to seek justification from the Minister for the additional S$40 million investment (approximately US$29.8 million) aimed at allowing commuters to continue using EZ-Link and Nets FlashPay cards.
LMW commends the Minister for addressing Singaporeans’ concerns
On Tuesday (23 January), Mr Leong conveyed his satisfaction that Minister Chee and the Ministry of Transport have taken steps to acknowledge and address Singaporeans’ concerns regarding digital inclusivity.
“We are heartened by Minister Chee’s apology “for the delays commuters experienced when they tried to convert their existing EZ Link cards” and his acknowledgement of Singaporeans’ concerns regarding the SimplyGo system.”
“It is a breath of fresh air to have a Minister apologise, take charge and reverse a publicly announced decision in response to public feedback, ” he added.
During the Parliamentary motion debate on “Building an Inclusive and Safe Digital Society” on 10 January, Mr Leong posed a supplementary question to Minister for Communications and Information Josephine Teo, seeking a response to the numerous negative feedback from Singaporeans about SimplyGo.
At the time, Mr Leong cautioned that Incidents like SimplyGo will affect the trust in digital systems in the long run.
However, his question went unanswered, as Minister Teo invited Mr Leong to file a separate Parliamentary Question for a proper response.
Netizens question the rationale behind the S$40 million expenditure
Observing comments on Mr Leong’s Facebook post, some lauded PSP’s NCMPs for persistently posing tough questions in Parliament despite challenges in holding the government accountable.
Netizens raised queries about the rationale behind the additional S$40 million spending to retain the old card payment system. Calls were made for PSP NCMPs to take this matter to Parliament, seeking detailed clarification on the government’s intended use of the funds and a breakdown of the costs incurred due to the SimplyGo saga glitches.
One netizen praised Mr Leong’s positive and collaborative approach, highlighting the PSP’s vital role in holding the government accountable and advocating for its people.
“By engaging in such analysis, one can gain a deeper understanding of the political dynamics and policy development processes in Singapore.”
Another comment expressed hope that all Ministers keep an open mind to embrace diverse views and opinions.
The comment urged them to cease writing off opposition contributions and proposals, emphasizing the need for a diverse and inclusive society to progress.
“By writing off opposition’s proposals, especially good and feasible ones, the ruling party is just practicing group thinking and only accepts ideas from within, ” the comment wrote.
A concerned netizen urged the NCMP to inquire in Parliament why the PAP government needs to allocate a substantial amount of taxpayers’ money and requested a detailed breakdown of the expenditure.
Additionally, the netizen urged the NCMP to ask the PAP government in Parliament about the measures they plan to implement to prevent a costly SimplyGo blunder from occurring again in the future.
Another netizen expressed a belief that the additional $40 million spending is more likely aimed at rectifying the SimplyGo glitches rather than admitting any government oversight.
The netizen pointed out that the blame appears to be shifted onto commuters who stick to existing cards.
She suggested that Mr Leong should pose questions inquiring about how the $40 million is justified, seeking clarification on the specific reasons and necessity behind such a substantial expenditure.
A suggestion also recommended that the NCMP should inquire about the total cost spent on the failed SimplyGo project, seeking a detailed breakdown of expenses.
Another netizen remarked that this time, Singaporeans successfully voiced their discontent, prompting a reversal of the unsound SimplyGo measure.
“Hopefully, Singaporeans learnt from this incident to voice their frustration and opinions with resolve loudly and that opposition plays a very important in getting their voices heard.”
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
Construction worker dies in Changi worksite accident; Driver arrested
Consumers Association of Singapore fined S$20,000 for PDPA breaches following two data security incidents
Singapore’s Yip Pin Xiu secures historic three-peat at Paris Paralympics
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
Philippine migrant group in SG hosts successful blood donation drive
China’s ex-convict jailed six years in Singapore for S$6.7M crypto scam
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
UN food agency halts operations in Gaza after vehicle shot by Israeli forces
KL City Hall cancels National Day event following sinkhole incident
Swiss court convicts 2 executives for embezzling S$1.8 billion from 1MDB
Again I see this as a half-baked solution without thinking hard enough before they tell the public about the changes. Changing the system back-end without affecting consumers would be an ideal situation so think before you lap pappy.
When the PAP Administration DEFAULT TREATMENT of SG Nat Reserves as small change, loose change, pocket dimes, SG and Singaporeans are in Living Hell. Even like now, when runaway inflation don’t seems to be in PAP’s in-tray.
Nothing is also in their pend-tray noticing the way PAP is focusing on in recent years.
How can an employee who is paid S$millions in salary botch such big sum of money of $40 million in tax money?
You need to itemize what you going to spend with the $40 million or is this an overly exaggerated budget. If so, this is dishoneśt, right Shame?
JT, unable to answer Opposition in Parliament? PAP’s habit of parachuting newly finds on the GRC tickets has brought incompetence to new levels throughout the State.