Opinion
A member of Gen Z shares about 24 lost years and who he will vote for as Elected President
In 23 years, three Presidents have served Singapore, yet Nick describes these as ‘the lost years’ for their figurehead roles. While Presidential candidates reference past leaders, questions arise on independence and the ability to critique established systems. Nick leans towards Mr Tan Kin Lian, valuing true independence.
by Nick
Born in the year 2000, I belong to Generation Z.
I have known three Presidents during my 23 years. The year before I was born, President S R Nathan got elected and he served until 2011.
President Tony Tan then served for six years, followed by President Halimah Yacob for six years.
I call these combined 24 years the lost years. Lost in the sense that they are entirely forgettable years as far as the presidency is concerned. We had three Presidents who never really went beyond being a mere figurehead.
Interestingly, Presidential candidate Mr Tharman Shanmugaratnam has invoked the name of late President Ong Teng Cheong several times during his campaign.
This is because he fully knows that President Ong has stood out as the one who displayed independence, courage and conviction.
After his six-year term ended (1993-1999), President Ong was told the cabinet would not support him for a second term.
He felt that he did not need the cabinet to support his re-election bid, but in any case, President Ong decided not to run against the government’s candidate S R Nathan.
It is one thing for Mr Tharman to invoke the name of President Ong.
It is a different matter altogether whether he has the spine and streak of independence that President Ong possessed.
Another presidential candidate, Mr Ng Kok Song, has cautioned against having a former finance minister, who established the rules on how the country’s reserves can be used, becoming President.
“You need somebody who knows enough about the subject, but who is not biased. It’s very difficult for someone who set up the system to question the system,” said the former chief investment officer of sovereign wealth fund GIC.
Mr Ng hit the nail on the head.
How is it possible for Mr Tharman, an insider who set up the system, to suddenly be an outsider looking to question and check the system?
However, Mr Ng himself is an establishment candidate. He and the third candidate, Mr Tan Kin Lian, are both 75 years of age.
Mr Tharman is the youngest. At 66, he can easily serve two six-year terms if elected to office.
We have already endured 24 lost years. Do we want to lose another 12 years?
My choice is between Mr Ng Kok Song and Mr Tan Kin Lian.
I favour Mr Tan Kin Lian. Although he has his flaws, he is the one who is truly independent of the establishment and the ruling party.
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
Construction worker dies in Changi worksite accident; Driver arrested
Consumers Association of Singapore fined S$20,000 for PDPA breaches following two data security incidents
Singapore’s Yip Pin Xiu secures historic three-peat at Paris Paralympics
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
Philippine migrant group in SG hosts successful blood donation drive
China’s ex-convict jailed six years in Singapore for S$6.7M crypto scam
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
UN food agency halts operations in Gaza after vehicle shot by Israeli forces
KL City Hall cancels National Day event following sinkhole incident
Swiss court convicts 2 executives for embezzling S$1.8 billion from 1MDB
For the benefit of Gen Z. Tharman is the one who said earning $1000 can own a BTO. He is also the one increased petrol price with the oil price was down. In fact he was with the government when prices of every thing increased, including the GST. Yes, he is internationally well known, but that is only good for FTAs and CECAs, do you want that? Tan Kin Lian was in Hong Lim Park, with protestors, protested on many issues. You can consider Tan Kin Lian as one of us. He is a on-the-ground man, not in the Ivory… Read more »
Yes all millennials and gen z must vote TKL. Way to go ….
Well said young man! There’s hope for Singapore!
Prata man, tancho man, nasi lemak macik came, saw and disappeared. And collected $millions along the way.
Is there anything significant they had done for us to remember them?
Answer: zilch
Clearly said. Tharman cannot be voted in because he has been part of setting up the system and will find no flaws. NKS, when he speaks, you can hear HC. TKL, though his oratorical skills may not match the other two candidates, is sincere in serving the Public. He is seeking a platform which is not political but with some degree of power to correct some of the policies of the PAP on top of the job description of an EP. He says, he will sit down and talk to the PM. We do not know how successful he will… Read more »
Does Gen Z know where does Avanda investment co of KOK get the billions from to invest?