Politics
Tan Kin Lian highlights NTUC income’s robust growth during his tenure, countering Ng Kok Song’s doubt on safeguarding reserves
Tan Kin Lian, former NTUC Income CEO, counters Ng Kok Song’s doubts on his grasp of safeguarding reserves.
Highlighting NTUC Income’s asset growth from S$28 million in 1977 to S$17 billion in 2007 under his three-decade leadership, he asserts his ability comparable to GIC, underpinned by prudent, secure investment principles.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2023/08/17063009/ng-kok2-side-1.jpg)
SINGAPORE: On Sunday (13 Aug), Presidential hopeful Ng Kok Song in an interview highlighted his extensive 45-year experience in shaping Singapore’s past reserves through public service roles, positioning himself as uniquely advantageous among competitors.
He pointedly emphasized that comprehending the intricacies of safeguarding Singapore’s past reserves is “not easy to understand”.
While Ng acknowledged that former Senior Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam is well-versed in the complexities of this task, he expressed his belief that the remaining potential candidates, Entrepreneur George Goh and former CEO of NTUC Income Tan Kin Lian, have yet to exhibit a comprehensive understanding.
Both Tan Kin Lian and George Goh refuted Ng’s statement, asserting their aptitude to protect Singapore’s past reserves.
Tan Kin Lian cited NTUC Income’s asset growth from $28 million in 1977 to $17 billion in 2007 during his three-decade tenure as CEO.
He stated, “I manage NTUC income, and in my last year before I left, the total assets was s$17 billion, it’s quite big, it’s more than sufficient.”
“Over 30 years managing the assets has been very important, and I have certain principles about investing for the long term, investing in the secure Investments to give a good long-term return.”
Hence, Mr Tan believed that his experience is probably as good as GIC, maybe better as he does know how to grow the assets.
the two-time contender for Singapore’s presidency was responding to media query on Monday (14 Aug) on the sidelines of a visit to Kopitiam Square food centre in Sengkang.
Tan Kin Lian emphasized his careful stewardship of NTUC Income due to the significance of the savings for over a million Singaporeans.
He acknowledged that the asset growth wasn’t solely attributed to his efforts, as Singapore’s economy also contributed.
“but you need to be managing it prudently in order to get good results,” Mr Tan added.
Cultivating well-rounded policy-making as an Independent President
On the other hand, Mr Tan expressed his aspiration to maintain independence from the government while fostering collaboration to cultivate well-rounded policy-making, amplifying diverse viewpoints including those of non-PAP politicians and PAP supporters.
” I want to be independent of the government, but I want to work with the government.”
“Because to make a change, you cannot be in confrontation, it doesn’t produce a result. Even the government side must also recognize that you need to hear the voices of other sites you cannot just be on one voice.”
He endeavors to amplify the collective voice of Singapore’s populace, encompassing the perspectives of both non-PAP politicians and PAP supporters.
“Because they are also affected by the cost of living, the cost of housing, they are also affected, ” Mr Tan said.
Mr Tan underlined his intent to resonate with the broader public sentiment, thus fostering more balance in the formulation of policies.
He said this can only be done cordially between the president and the prime minister.
“I don’t intend to be involved in politics because politics does not solve problems. Even the government must also not play politics, we just want to see what is the best solution to the problem that the people face. ”
Addressing another matter, Mr Tan expressed confusion over the campaigning guidelines provided by the Elections Department (ELD). A particular point of uncertainty involved the permissibility of activities such as walkabouts prior to Nomination Day.
Initially announcing his intention to conduct daily walkabouts starting last Saturday, he subsequently rescinded his Sunday plans following the issuance of ELD guidelines. However, he ultimately reinstated the walkabouts on Monday.
He lamented the ambiguity surrounding the allowance of walkabouts, sharing, “There’s some uncertainty about (whether) walkabouts are allowed or not, whether I have to cancel my walkabouts, because I thought it’s not allowed.”
“Then I’m told, ‘oh, it’s allowed’, so I’m here to walk around. So these are not fair to people.”
Furthermore, Mr Tan reiterated his concerns regarding the tight schedule preceding the presidential election, scheduled for Nomination Day on 22 August, and Polling Day on 1 September, if a contest arises.
Highlighting the mere 10-day window separating Nomination Day and Polling Day, a period that excludes the campaign-restricted Cooling-off Day, Mr Tan emphasized that this duration is inadequate for effectively conveying his message to the electorate.
“I want to tell the people of Singapore it is quite a difficult task for me so they must give me the support,” Mr Tan said.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Politics2 weeks ago
SM Lee: Singaporeans must ‘change attitudes’ as Govt promises ‘bold and necessary changes’
-
Community1 week ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media1 week ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore1 week ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore1 week ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation
TKL has clearly given the figures of $28m to $17b. NKS, please reveal yours and tell us if the $3billion of taxpayers’ funds have been returned to TH and the interest you paid. You leaned on the Public even though you claimed experience in hedge fund investment.