Connect with us

Comments

The same trick doesn’t work twice: PM Wong’s emotional appeal faces backlash online

Prime Minister Lawrence Wong’s emotional appeal for unity during his first National Day Rally speech sparked mixed reactions online. While introducing key initiatives like the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support scheme and expanded parental leave, his tearful moment drew criticism from some who argued that Singaporeans, burdened by high living costs, should be the ones shedding tears. Others defended his display of empathy, with some linking the speech to the upcoming General Election.

Published

on

Prime Minister Lawrence Wong delivered his first National Day Rally speech on 18 August, marking a significant milestone in his leadership as Singapore’s 4th Prime Minister.

The speech introduced several key initiatives and concluded with an emotional appeal for national unity and resilience.

In his address, PM Wong outlined his vision for Singapore’s future, announcing several major policy initiatives.

These include the introduction of the SkillsFuture Jobseeker Support scheme to assist unemployed workers, an expansion of maternity leave to include ten weeks of shared parental leave, and the discontinuation of the Gifted Education Programme (GEP).

He also revealed plans to give singles priority for Build-To-Order (BTO) flats and announced the relocation of the Singapore Sports School to Kallang.

As he concluded his speech, PM Wong spoke passionately about Singapore and its people.

His voice trembled slightly as he emphasized the importance of staying united in the face of challenges, drawing on the nation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic as an example.

“When the going gets tough, we do not back down. We press on, we strive to do better. We stay united and stand by our fellow citizens,” he stated.

“We care for one another, and we help each other along. We move forward together as one united people. That is how we make this little red dot shine ever more brightly.”

PM Wong’s emotional speech faces backlash amid concerns over living costs

Instead of gaining support and praise for his empathy, as he did when he cried during the COVID-19 pandemic over the sacrifices of healthcare workers, The Straits Times’ feature on PM Wong’s emotional moment during his National Day Rally speech has prompted varied reactions on social media.

Many netizens have criticized the Prime Minister on ST’s social media pages, Facebook, and TikTok.

Some users argued that Singaporean citizens, who are grappling with high living costs and overcrowding, should shed tears.

One commenter questioned why PM Wong was emotional, suggesting that citizens should be the ones crying instead.

Another user sarcastically remarked that while PM Wong might be emotional about pay increases, citizens are struggling with rising costs of essentials like food, water, and electricity.


With another, posting on TikTok, “that time when you jacked up the GST to 9%,this little red dot shone much brighter than ever before…”

Another user, claiming to be an actor, suggested that PM Wong’s display of emotion was merely performative, comparing it to an act meant to evoke sympathy.

The actor questioned what in the speech could have triggered such a reaction unless it involved a personal loss, implying that PM Wong’s tears seemed out of place in the context of his address.

Frustration with PM Wong’s leadership was evident among some netizens.

One user accused him of being a “useless puppet” and a “seat warmer,” arguing that despite his emotional appeal, Singaporeans still face high living costs, rising COE prices, and increased GST.

Another user drew a comparison between PM Wong and the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew, emphasizing that Mr Lee always prioritized the people.

They criticized PM Wong for raising the GST to 9% amid high inflation, arguing that this decision showed how disconnected he is from the struggles of ordinary Singaporeans.

The user also noted that while the late Mr Lee was synonymous with the People’s Action Party (PAP), today’s PAP is not the same as the one led by Mr Lee, suggesting a significant departure from his leadership style.

Supporters defend PM Wong’s emotional speech

While some netizens criticized PM Wong’s emotional National Day Rally speech, others defended his display of emotion.

One user argued that PM Wong’s tears demonstrated empathy, countering criticisms by suggesting that the detractors themselves lacked this quality.

Another supporter highlighted the benefits of good governance, pointing out that Singapore’s current state of prosperity is a result of collective efforts by the community and the government.

This user emphasized that respect and appreciation for the country’s leaders are important, even if their policies are not always perfect.

Another user appreciated PM Wong’s background and approach, describing his leadership style as refreshing and less elitist compared to previous leaders.

They noted Wong’s rise from a non-elite background, including his experience with HDB living and his diverse personal and professional journey.

Netizens link PM Wong’s Speech to upcoming general election

Some netizens have connected PM Wong’s recent emotional speech to the upcoming General Election (GE).

One user highlighted the disparity between the wealthy and ordinary Singaporeans, noting that while some people earn millions, many struggle to make ends meet.

They pointed to luxury condos in areas like the CBD, Orchard, and River Valley, where wealthy expatriates live, contrasting this with the sight of Singaporeans working as cleaners, security officers, gardeners, and food delivery riders.

The user urged Singaporeans to recognize these issues before the GE and suggested that unity among voters could lead to a more balanced outcome.

The user proposed that the Workers’ Party (WP) should win all the seats they contest, with the Progress Singapore Party (PSP) and Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) also gaining representation in parliament.

Another wrote, “cry one time only.. the only time when election coming.. we the people cry everyday u dont know ah?”

They recommended that the ruling People’s Action Party (PAP) remain in power but with a strong opposition presence to hold them accountable.

Another user emphasized that political parties should be judged by their actions rather than their rhetoric.

One wrote, “All problems can be solved if you stop imposing any new taxes, provide sustainable living for Singaporeans.”

They argued that tangible results are a better measure of a party’s effectiveness than merely their public statements.

Share this post via:
Continue Reading
32 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

🤓⚡️😭🟰🐊💦😈

Malulah, Profits Above People🖕🏻Malulah!

The first crocodile tears was that of lee con you, then lee hsien loong also cried croc tears, then lim boon heng, then lim sia suay, now laurence wrong. We weren’t born yesterday, you miserable crocodiles tears of pap.

Twice? I recall seeing him do this cry baby act many times, think it is more than two times. But are people convince of his act?

We should be crying for having to pay 9% GST when we cannot register to reclaim like corporates. The pain is inflicted by him on us. He is collecting more monies and spending it like it belongs to him.

Politicians crying in this context and them kissing babies during election campaign are similar.

Joe Biden the democratic world’s most powerful, and humble leader, POINTED OUT, when he cried, he love his job, BUT he LOVE his country MORE.

How ABOUT Loong when he pass the baton?

How about Laolan Wong? He certainly dont say, DARED NOT to say, he love the Millions of Dollars of salary more.

Shitgapore bankrupt

Do you think can loan from IMF

Answer is Yes ,

Political Reform

死老鬼 dont know ?

who says the same trick doesnt work twice?
LHL been crying all the time , yet 61% still gave him their votes.😡

Import so many aliens into Singapore every year, now cry to beg for unity among Singaporeans? Lol. Our Singapore core has long eroded by this white termite colony’s open legs policy decades ago. Every Singaporean is like surrounded by a high wall of aliens in our own country. Just go around to observe what is the ratio between Singaporean and foreigner population here. Don’t be shocked it could be 50 to 50. Or if worse, 30 to 70. Until the ratio of Singaporean to foreigner population drops to 80 to 20, then we can talk about unity and proud to… Read more »

Whether you like or hated LKY, the man got the substance to be a WORLD LEADER. Everytime he speaks, he has the poise, the confidence and yet display a tinge of arrogance to even make even his enemies listen to his speech. He was never emotional, LKY way of turning emotional was he gets even more arrogant and demanding! This is HOW CAPTIVATING LKY speech was. The only time he cried publically was during the 1965 split on TV. But you have to excuse LKY for that, becos that was a time of great chaos and desperate struggle for survival.… Read more »

On any given day, I Do Not Support PAP.
However, I am too informed to know that times are a little different for SG these coming days.
So I think it was a Decent Speech.

Wonder what other WORLD LEADERS WHO SAW THAT DISPLAY now think of your country, particularly of your men? Trump who had a near fatal missed by a 5.56 bullet clenched his fist in defiance and showed bravery in spite of that experience. Putin walked down the street or hall and Russian folks are in full admiration of his ‘MACHO-NESS’! And many other World leaders…..not say I want to say…even other female leader fare better than Wong. Anwar who saw the video would probably utter..” Apa ini, why this man always cry when giving a public speech?” But your ah Wong… Read more »

Hilarious comments…I laughed till can’t breathe.
I think he must’ve taken cry/acting lessons from ex boss..🤣 how to turn in the waterworks at will.

I think LW view of “The era of ‘invented in California; made in China’ is over” is pessimistic and clearly wrong. US have many businesses with China and the number is very big and many items still made in China, world factory. US shift away all manufacturing from China when many nations like India and Vietnam are not ready seem impossible and stupid. US depend on China and any big breakdown of relationship with China, US economy will be finish. If Trump become president, it is only 4 years, very short span. It is not the sure die pessimistic situation… Read more »

Last edited 3 months ago by Petrus Romanus

Yesterday Joe Biden also cried. Wong’s salary 5 X more than Joe Biden’s. Joe Biden tears more expensive or Wong’s?

But Joe Biden has to deal with Gaza, Hamas, Hizbollah, Russia, China, Houthis, Iran N Korea, Cuba and other world disruptors. Is Wong facing all these on SG?

How is Wong’s job so much more difficult, more burdensome, more complex than Joe Biden’s?

Aiyo, first NDR ony oredi want to cry like baby.

Next NDR, how? Beat his chest?

Opposition can form Gov

And that is my Faith

Why is it people like him or Kishore has a video online, a platoon of singpraisers drown out those critical of them?

While actors have a technique to cry on demand, I wont say this is the case because I am politically correct.

Is his message, “Just vote PAP”?

Trending