Parliament
Leong Mun Wai files formal complaint over Murali Pillai’s alleged misrepresentation in Parliament
NCMP Leong Mun Wai has lodged a formal complaint against Bukit Batok SMC MP Murali Pillai, citing alleged imputations of improper motives that had been recorded in Hansard.
During his speech, Mr. Murali asserted that Mr. Leong had advocated for some form of low-rent control in a parliamentary debate on the Lease Agreements for Retail Premises Bill.
Yet, when confronted by Mr. Leong in parliament, Mr. Murali denied having made such a claim.
![](https://gutzymedia.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com/wp/2023/08/17063148/LMW-Murali.png)
SINGAPORE: Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) for the Progress Singapore Party, Mr Leong Mun Wai, filed a formal complaint with Speaker of Parliament, Mr Seah Kian Peng, yesterday (16 August) following remarks made by Bukit Batok SMC Member of Parliament, Mr Murali Pillai of the People’s Action Party.
In a Facebook post, Mr Leong cited the Hansard, which is the official verbatim report of the Parliament proceedings, regarding a debate on the Lease Agreements for Retail Premises Bill that took place on 3 August 2023.
Mr Leong wrote, “This statement imputed improper motives to me as he had claimed I was advocating for rent control when I had not made any such statement during the debate.”
In his Facebook post, Mr Leong noted that Mr Murali contradicted his earlier statement thrice and refused to retract it.
He added that this exchange had misled the public, giving the impression that he was making false accusations.
The NCMP has requested a ruling from the Speaker regarding the matter. He has also called for Mr Murali to retract his original statement and apologize if the Speaker determines that improper motives were implied.
According to the Hansard, Mr Murali’s remarks, were as follows,
The hon Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Mr Leong Mun Wai had advocated some form of low-rent control. I have been in legal practice long enough to remember the spectre of the Rent Control Act. In those days, because of the Rent Control Act, there was no real investment by the landlords on their premises, leading to dilapidated buildings. And in the end, Singapore suffers because small Singapore would require a high utility of our land.
So, what is fair in the circumstances would have to be determined by market and now, we have this framework in terms of a committee, and we need to take a consensual approach to deal with all these issues.”
However, upon being confronted in the Parliament on 3 August, Mr Murali denied attributing the advocacy of low-rent control to Mr Leong.
The newly appointed Speaker, Mr Seah, interjected after a series of exchanges between the two MPs, stating, “I think that point has been clarified. It will all be recorded – what you said and what Mr Murali said.”
Mr Leong sought clarification, asking, “Speaker, Sir, so, can I confirm that if afterwards we have confirmed that I did not say that I am asking for lower rent, I am just talking of a general approach, Member Murali will apologise to me and correct his statement? Member Murali, can I ask whether you will commit to that?”
In response, Mr Murali stated, “Sir, I am not making any commitment, Sir. Of course, Mr. Leong is entitled to his views and I hope that he respects that I am entitled to my views as well. I have already offered that whatever we have said is recorded in Hansard and we stand by what we say.”
Mr Murali added that he wouldn’t make any commitment in that regard.
![](https://gutzy.asia/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Gutzy-Logo-whiteS.png)
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim on Minister Chee Hong Tat’s remarks on fiscal policy: Calls for genuine debate over rhetoric
-
Politics2 weeks ago
SM Lee: Singaporeans must ‘change attitudes’ as Govt promises ‘bold and necessary changes’
-
Community1 week ago
Toast Box faces backlash and boycott calls amid price increases
-
Media7 days ago
Notice to Our Readers: Moving Back to The Online Citizen
-
Singapore1 week ago
Singapore introduces new scheme in April 2025 offering up to S$6,000 in financial support for retrenched workers
-
Politics1 week ago
Jamus Lim raises concerns over high cost of living and its impact on Singaporeans’ sense of belonging
-
Opinion1 week ago
Chee Hong Tat’s call for fiscal prudence rings hollow amid contradictory government spending
-
Singapore1 week ago
Tan Suee Chieh: Sacrificing NTUC Income’s values for short-term gains undermines its foundation
Does someone also need the advantage of something like GRC system to win litigation cases ?
Dear LMW, kindly pls question Mini star of Defence about why the SAF have not stripped BG TCJ his rank for the adultery he committed as a MP ? Betrayal of trust. Why SAF allow his rank? Opposition MP pls raise in parliament to Min Defence
LMW really knows to punch where it hurts especially when it comes to dealing with that BB 2 headed arrogant snake.
LMW is doing the right thing.
Cannot be meek and accept their slanderous speech in or outside of Parliament.
Those people need to learn that democracy does not translate to tyranny of the majority!
🌈 Reserves being kept a secret is a double-edged sword which NKS and govt cannot address: 1. You say to avoid enemy attack. A boy can say that. But keeping it secret does not stop an attack. Furthermore, there is a ballpark known already. 2. The Risk is a rogue govt can use this excuse to squander billions away without Accountability. A rogue can use this excuse to coverup all major investment losses and reveal only a few small losses to fool people. There is No Need to hide the reserves as there is a ball park figure already known… Read more »
Mr Leong is someone I call my fellow comrades in arms. I would cover his back in times of war. But not some MPs